From "the Clash of Civilizations" to "the Dialogues between Civilizations", a trial to establish a philosophical theory to deepen mutual understanding between various religions.

为了建立一条从不同文明之间的冲突到不同文明之间的对话的道路，我们有必要避免将我们自己社会的世界视为唯一的绝对真理，同时我们认识到与其他文化的差异不是本质上的差异，而是外在的差异。例如，对于一个宗教，我们必须避免这样一种错误的判断，即这里不同的宗教之间存在教义上的差异，只要它们之间存在差异，仪式之间就有差异，而我们客观上区分它们的教义和仪式。我们的论点可以得到很好的支持，只要我们注意到以下两个事实：(1)基督教一神论和伊斯兰教在绝对一神论方面几乎没有教义上的差异，但他们之间的仪式差异太大，有时会发生冲突；(2)一元论和天主教之间在三位一体方面有很大的差异，但看起来他们之间的仪式差异很小，几乎没有冲突。

In order to establish a way to go from<the clash of civilizations> to<the dialogues between civilizations> it is necessary that we avoid to consider the view of the world of our own society as unique absolute truth, while we recognize differences from other cultures not as essential differences but as the outward ones. For example about a religions we must avoid such a wrong judgment that here is a doctrinal difference between religions, so long as there is differences ritual differences between them, while we objectively differentiate their doctrines and their rites. Our argument could be well supported, so long as we notice following two facts ;(1) that between Christian Unitarianism and Islam there is little doctrinal difference with regard to absolute monotheism, while there is so many ritual differences between them that conflicts sometimes occur between them, and(2) that between Unitarianism and Catholicism there is a great difference with regard to the Trinity, while it looks so like that there is little ritual differences between them that few conflicts occur between them.