Transformative urban heritage. Strategies for a sustainable European housing stock.

在欧洲城市中，历史悠久的住宅存量通常包括靠近市中心的紧凑、密集的建筑区域。由于其城市化和建筑品质以及在城市住房市场中发挥的关键社会经济功能，该库存在欧洲城市的身份中具有相当重要的作用。尽管在规划政策中经常被正式承认，但历史房屋仍然构成了物质和非物质遗产，对许多社区来说，它是城市生活的核心。然而，市场压力以及城市和国家政府提出的气候适应和减缓战略威胁着这一文化遗产。长期投资不足和房屋年久失修意味着，要使这些库存更加碳中和，成本高昂，而且在技术上具有挑战性。在采取这种行动的地方——通常是在单独的建筑物上——可能会导致商品化、士绅化和流离失所的压力。因此，拆除这些文化遗产是欧洲城市面临的一个真正的风险。该项目的主要目的是确定和评估作为文化遗产的重要组成部分的历史建筑如何为城市气候行动做出贡献，确定机会和良好实践以及社会，经济和政策障碍。我们的重点是利用现有的正式和非正式的文化遗产知识，包括居民的日常实践，以及适应和减缓气候变化的战略。该项目采用跨国比较方法、跨学科专业知识和当地利益相关者的见解，分析了马赛、维也纳、布拉格、比利时、比利时等四个不同城市背景下城市中不同参与者群体、法规和住房所有权结构的作用。格拉斯哥——创建一个工具包（方法），其中包括泛欧洲战略和做法，以协助扩大针对历史住房存量的减缓气候变化的地方战略和做法。

Within the European city, the historic housing stock often comprises a compact, densely built-up area close to city centres. Due to its urbanistic andarchitectural qualities as well as the key socio-economic function it plays in the urban housing market, this stock has a considerable and importantrole in the identity of the European city. Although often formally recognised as such in planning policy, historic housing nevertheless constitutes atangible and intangible heritage, and for many communities it is central to urban living. However, market pressure and climate adaptation andmitigation strategies proposed by city and national governments threaten this cultural heritage. Long-term under-investment and disrepair of thishousing has meant that making this stock more carbon neutral is costly and technically challenging. Where such action has been taken - usuallybased in individual buildings - commodification, gentrification, and displacement pressures might result. Consequently, the demolition of this culturalheritage is a real risk faced by European cities. The main intention of this project is to identify and evaluate how historic housing, viewed as a valuedelement of cultural heritage, can contribute to urban climate action, identifying opportunities and good practices as well as social, economic andpolicy barriers. Our focus is on using existing formal and informal knowledge of this cultural heritage, including everyday practices of residents, aswell as strategies for climate adaptation and mitigation. Using a transnational comparative approach, transdisciplinary expertise, and localstakeholder insights, the project provides an analysis of the role of different actor constellations, regulations, and ownership structures of the housingstock in cities within four different urban contexts - Marseille, Vienna, Prague, and Glasgow - to create a toolkit (methodology) that comprisespan-European strategies and practices that assist in scaling up local strategies and practices of climate-change mitigation for the historic housingstock.