Judging near and distant virtue and vice.

Judging near and distant virtue and vice.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
复制
发表时间:
2008-07-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Trope, Yaacov
Trope, Yaacov
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eyal, Tal;Liberman, Nira;Trope, Yaacov

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们认为,当行为在心理上是远距离的而不是近距离的时,人们会认为不道德的行为更具攻击性,而道德的行为更有道德。这是因为人们在道德原则方面考虑到更遥远的情况,而不是削弱具体情况的考虑。四项研究的结果支持这些预测。研究1表明,时间上较远的海侵(例如,吃自己的死狗)是根据道德原则而不是上下文信息来解释的。研究2和3进一步表明,道德上的攻击性行为的判断更严重时,想象从更遥远的时间(研究2)或社会(研究3)的角度。最后,研究4表明,道德行为(例如,收养残疾儿童)从时间距离上判断更为积极。研究结果表明,人们更容易将他们的道德原则应用于远距离而不是近距离的行为。
We propose that people judge immoral acts as more offensive and moral acts as more virtuous when the acts are psychologically distant than near. This is because people construe more distant situations in terms of moral principles, rather than attenuating situation-specific considerations. Results of four studies support these predictions. Study 1 shows that more temporally distant transgressions (e.g., eating one's dead dog) are construed in terms of moral principles rather than contextual information. Studies 2 and 3 further show that morally offensive actions are judged more severely when imagined from a more distant temporal (Study 2) or social (Study 3) perspective. Finally, Study 4 shows that moral acts (e.g., adopting a disabled child) are judged more positively from temporal distance. The findings suggest that people more readily apply their moral principles to distant rather than proximal behaviors.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.50
发表时间: 2005-01-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Libby, LK;Eibach, RP;Gilovich, T
通讯作者: Gilovich, T
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322
发表时间: 1979-01-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
ROSS, M;SICOLY, F
通讯作者: SICOLY, F
DOI: 10.1037/h0076486
发表时间: 1975-01-01
影响因子: 22.4
作者:
MILLER, DT;ROSS, M
通讯作者: ROSS, M
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x05000099
发表时间: 2005-08-01
影响因子: 29.3
作者:
Sunstein, CR
通讯作者: Sunstein, CR
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.3.781
发表时间: 2004-07-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Pronin, E;Ross, L;Gilovich, T
通讯作者: Gilovich, T