Promoting health equity in HIV prevention and treatment research: a practical guide to establishing, implementing, and sustaining community advisory boards.
Promoting health equity in HIV prevention and treatment research: a practical guide to establishing, implementing, and sustaining community advisory boards.
复制标题
促进艾滋病毒预防和治疗研究中的健康公平:建立,实施和维持社区咨询委员会的实用指南。
DOI:
10.1177/20499361231151508
复制
发表时间:
2023-01
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Harkness, Audrey
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Weinstein, Elliott R. R.;Herrera, Christian M. M.;Serrano, Lorenzo Pla;Kring, Edward Marti;Harkness, Audrey
Over the last 25 years, community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged as an innovative methodological approach to break down the barriers toward health equity in biopsychosocial research. Although there are several methods one can use to conduct CBPR research, one widely used established tool that has shown to be effective for engaging community meaningfully in research is community advisory boards (CABs). CABs are formalized collaborative bodies consisting of community and research stakeholders and have been integral in engaging underserved groups experiencing HIV-related health inequities at the early stages of the AIDS crisis. Even though evidence suggests that CABs are an effective tool for conducting high-quality, rigorous, and community-centered HIV-related research, there are minimal guidelines summarizing the steps needed for developing and maintaining a CAB. Therefore, to fill this gap in the literature, this article offers a practical guide to help researchers with minimal experience, particularly graduate students and early-stage investigators, feel more comfortable with establishing a CAB for equity-focused HIV-related research. This article synthesizes already established guidelines and frameworks for CAB development while specifically outlining unique steps related to the three main stages of CAB formation – establishment, implementation, and sustainment. Throughout this article, the authors offer tension points, generated from the literature and with consultation from a CAB working alongside the authors, that researchers and community partners may need to navigate during each of these three stages. In addition, best practices from the literature are identified for each step in the guidelines so that readers can see firsthand how research groups have carried out these steps in their own practice.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1353/cpr.2017.0044
发表时间:
2017-12-01
影响因子:
1.1
作者:
Halladay, Jacqueline R.;Donahue, Katrina E.;Corbie-Smith, Giselle
通讯作者:
Corbie-Smith, Giselle
DOI:
10.1097/00126334-200308010-00013
发表时间:
2003-08-01
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Morin, SF;Maiorana, A;Richards, TA
通讯作者:
Richards, TA
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Belone L;Lucero JE;Duran B;Tafoya G;Baker EA;Chan D;Chang C;Greene-Moton E;Kelley MA;Wallerstein N
通讯作者:
Wallerstein N
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Braun, Kathryn L.;Tsark, Joann U.;Chong, Clayton
通讯作者:
Chong, Clayton
DOI:
10.1037/amp0000167
发表时间:
2018-10
期刊:
The American psychologist
影响因子:
--
作者:
Collins SE;Clifasefi SL;Stanton J;The Leap Advisory Board;Straits KJE;Gil-Kashiwabara E;Rodriguez Espinosa P;Nicasio AV;Andrasik MP;Hawes SM;Miller KA;Nelson LA;Orfaly VE;Duran BM;Wallerstein N
通讯作者:
Wallerstein N