Utility of Light-Adapted Full-Field Electroretinogram ON and OFF Responses for Detecting Glaucomatous Functional Damage.
Utility of Light-Adapted Full-Field Electroretinogram ON and OFF Responses for Detecting Glaucomatous Functional Damage.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1167/tvst.12.8.16
复制
发表时间:
2023-08-01
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Fortune, Brad
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dunn, Michaela;Cull, Grant;Reynaud, Juan;Jennings, Dawn;Holthausen, Trinity;Di Polo, Adriana;Fortune, Brad
关键词:
To compare parameters of electroretinogram (ERG) responses for their ability to detect functional loss in early stages of nonhuman primate (NHP) experimental glaucoma (EG), including photopic negative responses (PhNR) to a standard brief red flash on a blue background (R/B) and 200-ms-long R/B and white-on-white (W/W) flashes, to W/W flicker stimuli (5–50 Hz), and to a dark-adapted intensity series. Light-adapted ERGs were recorded in 12 anesthetized monkeys with unilateral EG. Amplitudes and implicit times of the a-wave, b-wave, and d-wave were measured, as well as amplitudes of PhNRs and oscillatory potentials for flash onset and offset. Flicker ERGs were measured using peak–trough and fundamental frequency analyses. Dark-adapted ERG parameters were modeled by Naka–Rushton relationships. Only PhNR amplitudes were significantly reduced in EG eyes compared to fellow control (FC) eyes. The d-wave implicit time was delayed in EG versus FC eyes only for the W/W long flash, but in all eyes it was 10 to 20 ms slower for R/B versus the W/W condition. Flicker ERGs were <0.5 ms delayed in EG versus FC overall, but amplitudes were affected only at 5 Hz. The brief R/B PhNR amplitude had the highest sensitivity to detect EG and strongest correlation to parameters of structural damage. The PhNR to the standard brief R/B stimulus was best for detecting and following early-stage functional loss in NHP EG. These results suggest that there would be no benefit in using longer duration flashes to separate onset and offset responses for clinical management of glaucoma.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Gowrisankaran, Sowjanya;Genead, Mohamed A.;Anastasakis, Anastasios;Alexander, Kenneth R.
通讯作者:
Alexander, Kenneth R.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Fortune B;Reynaud J;Hardin C;Wang L;Sigal IA;Burgoyne CF
通讯作者:
Burgoyne CF
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Cull, Grant;Burgoyne, Claude F.;Wang, Lin
通讯作者:
Wang, Lin
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
EVERS, HU;GOURAS, P
通讯作者:
GOURAS, P
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Banerjee, Aniruddha;Khurana, Mona;Sen, Parveen
通讯作者:
Sen, Parveen