Effect of personality traits on driving style: Psychometric adaption of the multidimensional driving style inventory in a Chinese sample.

Effect of personality traits on driving style: Psychometric adaption of the multidimensional driving style inventory in a Chinese sample.
复制标题

人格特质对驾驶风格的影响:中国样本多维驾驶风格量表的心理测量适应性

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0202126
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Zhang K
Zhang K
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang Y;Qu W;Ge Y;Sun X;Zhang K

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

驾驶风格是驾驶心理学中的一个重要因素,对驾驶行为的有效评价具有重要意义。对中国驾驶员驾驶风格的研究有助于了解中国驾驶员的整体状况。本研究旨在编制一个适合中国国情的驾驶风格量表,并验证该量表的信度和效度。本研究采用多维驾驶风格量表(MDSI)、大五人格量表(BFI)和驾驶行为问卷(DBQ)对296名中国驾驶员进行了问卷调查,并对社会人口学信息进行了问卷调查。通过验证性因素分析对假设结构进行检验,并对结构进行调整,修订了MDSI中文版,该中文版包含12个条目,分为4种驾驶风格,即冒险风格、愤怒-高速风格、谨慎风格和焦虑风格。量表的信度和效度都可以接受。结果表明,驾驶风格与驾驶行为的自我报告密切相关。具体而言,冒险型、愤怒高速型、焦虑型与危险驾驶行为均呈正相关。谨慎型驾驶风格与积极驾驶行为呈正相关,与危险驾驶行为呈负相关。此外,还发现,焦虑与罚款呈负相关。对于个性,我们发现冒险,愤怒-高速,小心和焦虑的风格与经常对驾驶产生负面影响的人格特质之间存在正相关关系,如外向性和神经质。同时,这三种风格总体上与愉快性和宜人性呈负相关。此外,谨慎型人格与随和性、宜人性显著正相关。本研究为中国驾驶员驾驶风格的识别提供了一个有用的工具,为今后的研究和道路安全相关部门提供了一个有用的工具。
Driving style is an important factor in driving psychology, which is useful for effectively evaluating driving behaviors. Exploring driving style in a Chinese sample could help understand the overall situation of Chinese drivers. This study aims to develop a measurement of driving style fit for the Chinese situation and to validate the validity and reliability of this scale. In this study, 296 drivers from China completed the Chinese version of the multidimensional driving style inventory (MDSI), the Big Five Inventory (BFI), and the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) as well as several questions about socio-demographic information. After testing the assumed structure by a confirmatory factor analysis, and adjusting the structure, a brief version of Chinese version of MDSI with twelve items categorized into four driving styles, namely, risky style, angry- high-velocity style, careful style and anxious style was revised. The validity and reliability of the scales were acceptable. The results showed that driving styles were closely correlated with self-reported driving behaviors. Specifically, risky style, angry- high-velocity style, and anxious style are all positively associated with dangerous driving behaviors. Meanwhile, careful style was positively associated with positive driving behaviors and negatively correlated with dangerous driving behaviors. Anxious was also found to be negatively associated with fines. For personality, we found a positive relationship between risky, angry- high-velocity, careful and anxious styles and the personality traits that often have negative effects on driving, such as extraversion and neuroticism. Meanwhile, these three styles were negatively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness in general. In addition, careful style was positively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness. The current study shows convincing evidence for the validity and reliability of the brief MDSI-C and develops a useful tool for identify the driving style of Chinese drivers for future research and relevant departments of road safety.
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.276
发表时间: 2003-04-01
影响因子: 9.9
作者:
Barling, J;Kelloway, EK;Iverson, RD
通讯作者: Iverson, RD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.018
发表时间: 2005-07-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Özkan, T;Lajunen, T
通讯作者: Lajunen, T
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.016
发表时间: 2006-10-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Dahlen, Eric R.;White, Roy P.
通讯作者: White, Roy P.
DOI: 10.5507/ag.2017.005
发表时间: 2017-01-01
期刊: ACTA GYMNICA
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Klinar, Polona;Burnik, Stojan;Kajtna, Tanja
通讯作者: Kajtna, Tanja
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01805.x
发表时间: 1997-07-16
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Lawton, R;Parker, D;Stradling, SG
通讯作者: Stradling, SG