Does Banking Union Worsen the EU's Democratic Deficit? The Need for Greater Supervisory Data Transparency
Does Banking Union Worsen the EU's Democratic Deficit? The Need for Greater Supervisory Data Transparency
复制标题
银行业联盟是否会加剧欧盟的民主赤字?
DOI:
10.1111/jcms.12226
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mark Hallerberg
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gandrud;Christopher;Mark Hallerberg
Does banking union exacerbate the European Union's democratic deficit? Using Scharpf's ‘input’ and ‘output’ legitimacy concepts, it is argued in this article that its design does worsen the democratic deficit. There are good reasons to limit ‘input legitimacy’ for politically independent institutions. ‘Output legitimacy’ is then even more relevant. Transparency is a key part of ‘output legitimacy’. It enables actors to judge whether the regulator is acting in the public's interest and can improve their outputs. This article focuses on the banking data that the supervisors collect. Data available to the European public is evaluated and compared to America's banking union. European practices are not comparable in terms of availability or detail. An original survey of relevant officials is conducted, which results in the finding that only 11 of 28 Member States release any information on the banks they supervise. Both EU and national supervisors should provide publicly available, timely and consistent individual bank data.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
A. Verdun
通讯作者:
A. Verdun
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
F. Liedorp;Robert H. J. Mosch;Carin van der Cruijsen;J. de Haan
通讯作者:
J. de Haan
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1994
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Lupia;Mathew D. McCubbins
通讯作者:
Mathew D. McCubbins
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
G. Majone
通讯作者:
G. Majone
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
Social Science Research Network
影响因子:
--
作者:
T. Cordella;Eduardo Levy
通讯作者:
Eduardo Levy