A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration.
A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004
复制
发表时间：
2014-07
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Tharp AT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
DeGue S;Valle LA;Holt MK;Massetti GM;Matjasko JL;Tharp AT
这项系统的审查审查了140项性暴力初级预防战略的成果评价。审查有两个目标：1)描述和评估这一领域评估研究的广度、质量和发展；2)通过在严格评估中对性暴力行为结果有效性的项目进行分类，总结性暴力预防从业者可用的最佳研究证据。评估文献中的大多数性暴力预防策略都是简短的心理教育方案，侧重于增加知识或改变态度，没有一个方案显示出使用严格的评估设计对性暴力行为有效的证据。根据本次审查中包括的评估研究，在严格的结果评估中，只有三项主要预防战略显示对性暴力行为有显著影响：安全日期；改变边界(仅限建筑物一级干预)；以及与1994年《美国暴力侵害妇女法案》相关的资金。到目前为止，缺乏有效的预防战略可能反映了许多现有方案的设计与确定的有效预防原则之间缺乏契合性。
This systematic review examined 140 outcome evaluations of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. The review had two goals: 1) to describe and assess the breadth, quality, and evolution of evaluation research in this area; and 2) to summarize the best available research evidence for sexual violence prevention practitioners by categorizing programs with regard to their evidence of effectiveness on sexual violence behavioral outcomes in a rigorous evaluation. The majority of sexual violence prevention strategies in the evaluation literature are brief, psycho-educational programs focused on increasing knowledge or changing attitudes, none of which have shown evidence of effectiveness on sexually violent behavior using a rigorous evaluation design. Based on evaluation studies included in the current review, only three primary prevention strategies have demonstrated significant effects on sexually violent behavior in a rigorous outcome evaluation: Safe Dates; Shifting Boundaries (building-level intervention only,); and funding associated with the 1994 U.S. Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). The dearth of effective prevention strategies available to date may reflect a lack of fit between the design of many of the existing programs and the principles of effective prevention identified by.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01985.x
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Dodge, Kenneth A.
通讯作者：
Dodge, Kenneth A.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Anderson, LA;Whiston, SC
通讯作者：
Whiston, SC
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Backes, Bethany L.
通讯作者：
Backes, Bethany L.
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
DeGue, Sarah;Holt, Melissa K.;Valle, Linda Anne
通讯作者：
Valle, Linda Anne
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Briss, PA;Zaza, S;Harris, JR
通讯作者：
Harris, JR