Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review.

Computerized cognitive training with older adults: a systematic review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0040588
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Rebok GW
Rebok GW
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kueider AM;Parisi JM;Gross AL;Rebok GW

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对认知健康的老年人使用基于计算机的认知干预的有效性进行了一项系统的综述。研究包括符合以下标准的研究:训练时平均样本年龄至少55岁;参与者没有阿尔茨海默病或轻度认知障碍;以及研究测量了训练结果的认知结果。不包括原始数据的理论文章、评论文章和书籍章节被排除在外。我们确定了1984至2011年间发表的151项研究,其中38项符合纳入标准,并根据使用的计算机程序类型进一步分为三组:经典认知训练任务、神经心理学软件和视频游戏。干预组报告的训练前效果大小范围为0.06至6.32(经典认知训练干预)、0.19至7.14(神经心理软件干预)和0.09至1.70(视频游戏干预)。大多数研究报告称,老年人不需要精通技术就能成功完成培训或从培训中受益。总体而言,研究结果与更传统的纸笔认知培训方法的结果相当或更好,这表明计算机化培训是一种有效的、劳动强度较低的替代方案。
A systematic review to examine the efficacy of computer-based cognitive interventions for cognitively healthy older adults was conducted. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: average sample age of at least 55 years at time of training; participants did not have Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment; and the study measured cognitive outcomes as a result of training. Theoretical articles, review articles, and book chapters that did not include original data were excluded. We identified 151 studies published between 1984 and 2011, of which 38 met inclusion criteria and were further classified into three groups by the type of computerized program used: classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games. Reported pre-post training effect sizes for intervention groups ranged from 0.06 to 6.32 for classic cognitive training interventions, 0.19 to 7.14 for neuropsychological software interventions, and 0.09 to 1.70 for video game interventions. Most studies reported older adults did not need to be technologically savvy in order to successfully complete or benefit from training. Overall, findings are comparable or better than those from reviews of more traditional, paper-and-pencil cognitive training approaches suggesting that computerized training is an effective, less labor intensive alternative.
DOI: 10.1097/wad.0b013e31819c6137
发表时间: 2009-07
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Barnes DE;Yaffe K;Belfor N;Jagust WJ;DeCarli C;Reed BR;Kramer JH
通讯作者: Kramer JH
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011537
发表时间: 2010-07-14
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Berry AS;Zanto TP;Clapp WC;Hardy JL;Delahunt PB;Mahncke HW;Gazzaley A
通讯作者: Gazzaley A
DOI: 10.1037/a0013494
发表时间: 2008-12
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Basak, Chandramallika;Boot, Walter R.;Voss, Michelle W.;Kramer, Arthur F.
通讯作者: Kramer, Arthur F.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271
发表时间: 2002-11-13
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Ball, K;Berch, DB;Willis, SL
通讯作者: Willis, SL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381
发表时间: 2007-07-01
影响因子: 14
作者:
Brookmeyer, Ron;Johnson, Elizabeth;Arrighi, H. Michael
通讯作者: Arrighi, H. Michael