Integrating Inquiry-Based Science and Education Methods Courses in a "Science Semester" for Future Elementary Teachers

将基于探究的科学和教育方法课程整合到未来小学教师的“科学学期”中

• 批准号: 0088527
• 负责人: Steven Fifield
• 金额: $ 19.91万
• 依托单位: University of Delaware
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2001-01-01 至 2005-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0088527&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Integrating; Inquiry; Based; Science; Education

Interdisciplinary (99) In this project we are adapting problem-based learning and other inquiry-based approaches to create a curriculum where science and education methods are integrated ("science semester") for elementary teacher education majors. Our goal is to foster integrated understandings of science and pedagogy that future elementary teachersneed to effectively use inquiry-based approaches in their classrooms. This projectresponds to calls to improve science education for all students (AAAS, "Science for All Americans," 1986; "Benchmarks for Science Literacy," 1993) by making preservice teachers' experiences in undergraduate science courses more consistent with reforms at the K-12 level (NRC, "National Science Education Standards," 1996; NSF, "Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology," 1996, NSF96-139).The senior personnel in this proposal collectively teach three science courses (biology, earth science, physical science) and an elementary science education methods course thatare required for elementary teacher education (ETE) majors. A variety of active, collaborative, and inquiry-based approaches are used in these courses, but their collective impact is weakened by the lack of coordination in the students' degree programs. Presently, students take the courses in variable sequences and at widely scattered times. Too many students fail to appreciate the value of science courses to their future careers as teachers, and when they reach the methods course in the junior year they often retain little of the science content studied earlier. These episodic encounters with science make it difficult for students to learn the content, and to translate their understandings of science into effective, inquiry-based teaching strategies.To encourage integrated understandings of science concepts and pedagogy, a coordinated set of science and methods courses are being designed as a junior-year science semester.Traditional subject matter boundaries are being crossed to stress shared themes thatteachers must understand to teach standards-based elementary science. The design is adapting exemplary approaches that support both learning science and learning how to teach science. Students work collaboratively on multidisciplinary problem-based learning (PBL) activities that place science concepts in authentic contexts and build learning skills. "Lecture" meetings are large group active learning sessions that help students understand difficult concepts, make connections between class activities, and launch and wrap-up PBL problems. Investigatory labs include activities from elementary science kits as launching points for in-depth investigations that demonstrate the continuity of science concepts and pedagogies across age levels. In the methodscourse students critically explore the theory and practice of elementary scienceteaching, drawing on their shared experiences of inquiry learning in the science courses. Field placements in elementary classrooms are built-in to allow students to ground their studies of science and pedagogy in actual practice. Participating faculty are collaborating with external evaluators to assess the impact of this project. The ability to plan for and use inquiry approaches depends strongly on sound understandings of science concepts, so formative aspects of the evaluation examine students' developing science content and pedagogical knowledge (e.g., conceptions of inquiry teaching). The summative aspect of the evaluation will examine whether student teachers who completed the science semester teach science differently than those who complete traditional (stand-alone) courses in science and methods. External evaluators use structured interviews of supervising teachers, survey data from the student teachers, and classroom observations of student teachers sampled from the science semester and traditional groups to examine how they conceive of and use inquiry-based approaches in their science lessons.

跨学科（99）在这个项目中，我们正在适应基于问题的学习和其他基于探究的方法，以创建一个课程，其中科学和教育方法是综合的（“科学学期”）小学教师教育专业。我们的目标是促进科学和教育学的综合理解，未来的小学教师需要在课堂上有效地使用基于探究的方法。该项目响应了改善所有学生科学教育的呼吁（美国科学促进会，《面向所有美国人的科学》，1986年;《科学素养的基准》，1993年），使副教授在本科科学课程中的经验与K-12水平的改革更加一致（NRC，“国家科学教育标准”，1996年; NSF，“塑造未来：科学、数学、工程和技术本科教育的新期望，”1996，NSF 96 -139）。本建议中的高级人员共同教授三门科学课程（生物学，地球科学，物理科学）和小学教师教育（埃特）专业所需的小学科学教育方法课程。在这些课程中使用了各种积极的，协作的和以探究为基础的方法，但由于学生学位课程缺乏协调，它们的集体影响被削弱了。目前，学生们在可变序列和广泛分散的时间参加课程。太多的学生没有意识到科学课程对他们未来教师职业的价值，当他们在三年级学习方法课程时，他们通常很少保留以前学习的科学内容。这些与科学的偶然接触使学生很难学习内容，也很难将他们对科学的理解转化为有效的、以探究为基础的教学策略。为了鼓励对科学概念和教学法的综合理解，一套协调的科学和方法课程正在设计作为一个初级-传统的学科界限正在被跨越，以强调教师必须理解的共同主题，以教授基于标准的基础科学。该设计采用了支持学习科学和学习如何教授科学的示范方法。学生们在多学科的基于问题的学习（PBL）活动中合作，将科学概念置于真实的环境中，并建立学习技能。“讲座”会议是大型小组主动学习会议，帮助学生理解困难的概念，使课堂活动之间的联系，并启动和总结PBL问题。调查实验室包括基础科学工具包中的活动，作为深入调查的启动点，展示不同年龄段科学概念和教学法的连续性。在方法课程中，学生批判性地探索基础科学教学的理论和实践，借鉴他们在科学课程中探究学习的共同经验。在小学教室的实地安置是内置的，让学生在实际实践中的科学和教育学的研究接地。参与的教师正在与外部评估人员合作，以评估该项目的影响。计划和使用探究方法的能力在很大程度上取决于对科学概念的正确理解，因此评估的形成方面检查学生发展科学内容和教学知识（例如，探究教学的概念）。评估的总结性方面将检查完成科学学期的学生教师是否与完成科学和方法的传统（独立）课程的学生教师不同。外部评估人员使用结构化访谈的监督教师，学生教师的调查数据，并从科学学期和传统群体抽样的学生教师的课堂观察，以研究他们如何构思和使用基于探究的方法在他们的科学课。