RAPID: American's Perceptions of China

RAPID:美国人对中国的看法

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    1561566
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    美国
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 财政年份:
    2016
  • 资助国家:
    美国
  • 起止时间:
    2016-09-01 至 2017-08-31
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

In August, 2015, the Chinese RMB was devalued, which came as something of surprise to the international financial community and led to dramatic volatility in many markets, including the Chinese. Prior to this devaluation, an experiment was included on the 2014 CCES (Cooperative Congressional Election Survey) that had as its treatment two short vignettes in the guise of news stories (one positive, one negative) about how the Chinese government was managing its currency. Soon after the 2015, this same experiment was repeated using a similar sample. Given the rumored upcoming devaluation of the RMB and the focus of the presidential election on Chinese trade, the same experiment will be repeated as a module of the 2016 CCES. This study will allow the study of how framing of an issue, experimentally, affects how people understand and evaluate China in a variety of ways. It also allows us to examine different conditions under which people react and how these conditions impact their reactions. This includes the previous experiments prior to a devaluation and soon after a devaluation and now during a presidential election cycle.The intellectual merit of this project is two-fold. First, there is the original, direct idea, of having the opportunity to study how the framing of an issue, experimentally (and now, with full control condition), affects how people understand and evaluate China in a variety of ways. The second idea is to repeat a survey and an experiment about Chinese currency and its possible management before the respondents could realistically know that the Chinese might actually do so, but could only guess, and guess during a congressional election, with a variety of claims in the "air" about China. We then repeat it while there is news coverage available that is close to the experimental treatment, per se, and then repeat it again (it is assumed) once that coverage is well past, but when in the middle of presidential election campaign (and thus are likely to get mostly a presidential level set of messages about China from the two parties, rather than a more diffuse and not so nationally focused). Rarely, is there such an opportunity to have a before, during, after trial. Rarely do we also have the opportunity to address how framing might work, given different background information in the actual political environment. The broader impact of the study will be an extension of the understanding of how Americans view the "rising of China," as it becomes ever more newsworthy. And, in particular, the ability to see how malleable perceptions and evaluations are, as they are buffeted about by real events in China, by domestic politics, and by the framing of news coverage.
2015年8月,人民币贬值,令国际金融界感到意外,并导致包括中国在内的许多市场剧烈波动。在这次贬值之前,2014年CCES(合作国会选举调查)中包含了一项实验,该实验以新闻故事的形式(一个正面,一个负面)描述了中国政府如何管理其货币。在2015年之后不久,使用类似的样本重复了相同的实验。鉴于人民币即将贬值的传言和总统选举对中国贸易的关注,同样的实验将作为2016年CCES的一个模块重复进行。 这项研究将允许研究如何框架的一个问题,实验,影响人们如何理解和评价中国在各种方式。 它还使我们能够研究人们反应的不同条件以及这些条件如何影响他们的反应。 这包括以前在贬值之前和贬值之后不久以及现在在总统选举周期期间进行的实验。首先,有一个原始的、直接的想法,即有机会研究一个问题的框架是如何通过实验(现在是完全控制条件)影响人们如何以各种方式理解和评价中国的。第二个想法是重复一次关于中国货币及其可能的管理的调查和实验,在受访者能够切实地知道中国人可能会这样做之前,但只能猜测,在国会选举期间猜测,各种各样的关于中国的说法都在“空气”中。然后,当有接近实验处理的新闻报道时,我们重复它,本质上,然后再次重复(假设)一旦报道过去,但是在总统竞选期间(因此可能会从两党获得关于中国的主要总统级别的信息,而不是更分散,不是全国性的)。很少有这样的机会,有一个之前,期间,之后审判。我们很少有机会讨论框架是如何工作的,因为在实际的政治环境中有不同的背景信息。 这项研究的更广泛影响将是对美国人如何看待“中国崛起”的理解的延伸,因为它变得越来越有新闻价值。尤其是,当人们的看法和评价受到中国真实的事件、国内政治和新闻报道框架的冲击时,他们能够看到这些看法和评价的可塑性。

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

John Aldrich其他文献

Institutions, information, and faction: an experimental test of Riker’s federalism thesis for political parties
  • DOI:
    10.1007/s11127-012-0040-z
  • 发表时间:
    2012-11-21
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.200
  • 作者:
    John Aldrich;Michael Munger;Jason Reifler
  • 通讯作者:
    Jason Reifler
Liberal games: Further comments on social choice and game theory
  • DOI:
    10.1007/bf01718815
  • 发表时间:
    1977-06-01
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.200
  • 作者:
    John Aldrich
  • 通讯作者:
    John Aldrich
The liberal paradox
自由主义悖论
  • DOI:
  • 发表时间:
    2013
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    0
  • 作者:
    K. E. Coggins;James Stimson;Pamela Conover;Frank Baumgartner;Kevin McGuire;John Aldrich
  • 通讯作者:
    John Aldrich
Burnside’s engagement with the “modern theory of statistics”
Sophisticated and myopic? Citizen preferences for Electoral College reform
  • DOI:
    10.1007/s11127-013-0056-z
  • 发表时间:
    2013-01-15
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    2.200
  • 作者:
    John Aldrich;Jason Reifler;Michael C. Munger
  • 通讯作者:
    Michael C. Munger

John Aldrich的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('John Aldrich', 18)}}的其他基金

Preparing for the Future of Survey Research
为调查研究的未来做好准备
  • 批准号:
    2040847
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research: Women Legislators and Partisan Bridging
博士论文研究:女性立法者与党派桥梁
  • 批准号:
    1746816
  • 财政年份:
    2018
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Values and Attitudes
政治学博士论文研究:价值观和态度
  • 批准号:
    1122624
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: The Causes, Consequences, and Measurement of Perceived Political Control
政治学博士论文研究:感知政治控制的原因、后果和测量
  • 批准号:
    1023762
  • 财政年份:
    2010
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
EITM Summer Training Institute (Political Science Program)
EITM暑期培训学院(政治学项目)
  • 批准号:
    0648205
  • 财政年份:
    2007
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
EITM Summer Training Institute (Political Science Program)
EITM暑期培训学院(政治学项目)
  • 批准号:
    0618254
  • 财政年份:
    2006
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Identity Fluidity in the Voting Booth: The Influence of a Latino Social Group Cue on Vote Choice
政治学博士论文研究:投票亭中的身份流动性:拉丁裔社会群体线索对投票选择的影响
  • 批准号:
    0519022
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Strategic Voting for the Israeli Knesset, 2003
以色列议会战略投票,2003 年
  • 批准号:
    0312654
  • 财政年份:
    2003
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Too Close for Comfort: Elite Cues and Strategic Voting in Multicandidate Elections
政治学博士论文研究:太接近而令人不安:多候选人选举中的精英线索和战略投票
  • 批准号:
    0214677
  • 财政年份:
    2002
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Doctoral Dissertation Research in Political Science: Dynamics of Multicandidate Elections: Menu-Dependent Preferences
政治学博士论文研究:多候选人选举的动态:菜单相关的偏好
  • 批准号:
    0111987
  • 财政年份:
    2001
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似海外基金

Broadening Participation Research: Understanding faculty attitudes, competency, and perceptions of providing career advising to African American STEM students at HBCUs
扩大参与研究:了解教师对 HBCU 的非裔美国 STEM 学生提供职业建议的态度、能力和看法
  • 批准号:
    2306671
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Understanding Perceptions of HIV Risk, PrEP, and PrEP use among African American Women Attending an HBCU
了解就读 HBCU 的非裔美国女性对 HIV 风险、PrEP 和 PrEP 使用的看法
  • 批准号:
    10925565
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
The Shades of Beauty: Understanding African and Asian American Women's Perceptions of Using Skin Lightening Products and Creating Innovative and Educational Messages
美丽的色调:了解非洲和亚裔美国女性对使用美白产品的看法并创造创新和教育信息
  • 批准号:
    10639265
  • 财政年份:
    2022
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Perceptions of Multipurpose Prevention Technologies Aimed at HIV/STI/unintended pregnancy among African-American Women in the Deep South
对针对南方腹地非裔美国妇女艾滋病毒/性传播感染/意外怀孕的多用途预防技术的看法
  • 批准号:
    10415831
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Perceptions of Multipurpose Prevention Technologies Aimed at HIV/STI/unintended pregnancy among African-American Women in the Deep South
对针对南方腹地非裔美国妇女艾滋病毒/性传播感染/意外怀孕的多用途预防技术的看法
  • 批准号:
    10534239
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Understanding Perceptions of HIV Risk, PrEP, and PrEP use among African American Women Attending an HBCU
了解就读 HBCU 的非裔美国女性对 HIV 风险、PrEP 和 PrEP 使用的看法
  • 批准号:
    10875004
  • 财政年份:
    2017
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Race stereotypes and self perceptions in African American youth
非裔美国青年的种族刻板印象和自我认知
  • 批准号:
    7485399
  • 财政年份:
    2008
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Race stereotypes and self perceptions in African American youth
非裔美国青年的种族刻板印象和自我认知
  • 批准号:
    7678588
  • 财政年份:
    2008
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
Under America's Shadow : A Comparative Study of American Perceptions and Social Formation in Japan and the Philippines
美国的阴影下:美国观念与日本和菲律宾社会形态的比较研究
  • 批准号:
    17330035
  • 财政年份:
    2005
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Obstructive Sleep Apnea: African American Perceptions
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:非裔美国人的看法
  • 批准号:
    6964621
  • 财政年份:
    2004
  • 资助金额:
    $ 1.51万
  • 项目类别:
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了