权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Council in the Memory of the City. The Negotiation of Knowledge about the Past in urban historical writing in the Upper Rhine region in the 15th and 16th century

城市记忆委员会。

基本信息

批准号：
231906078
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Birgit Studt
金额：
--
依托单位：
Historisches Seminar
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2013
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2012-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/231906078?language=en
关键词：
Council Memory City.Negotiation Knowledge

项目摘要

This project proposes a new approach towards late medieval and early modern historical writing in the Upper Rhine region. In it, texts from historical writing are no longer conceived as constructions of the past by which authorities looked to legitimize their power, but instead as part of urban memory in which the past is negotiated historiographically between different social groups. The study takes the Chronicle of the Council of Constance, and especially the various forms of historical writing inspired by it, as its starting point. The Chronicle of the Council of Constance is an in its form unique account of the international assembly gathered in the city from 1414 to 1418. It was written shortly afterwards by Ulrich Richental and contains a series of illuminations, lists of all the various attendants and the depictions of their coats-of-arms. The chronicle received a lot of attention in modern research, which however concentrated mostly on the lost original text - the eyewitness account - of Richental, although the earliest surviving manuscripts date only from the second half of the 15th century. Whereas most scholars endeavor to bridge the gap of historical tradition towards the events of the council, this project focuses on the apparent configurations in which the text was handed down in the manuscripts. It analyses the reasons for the transformation and publication of the chronicle in the late 15th century, which demonstrate its attractiveness even after some time had passed since the events of the council. This ongoing topicality of the subject matter for historical writing is also apparent in the second period of reception of the text during the Reformation, when contemporaries started to draw parallels between the teachings of Jan Hus, burnt at the stake as a heretic during the council of Constance, and those of Martin Luther. The Chronicle of the Council of Constance had long since detached itself from its author and offered its various urban recipients in the cities of the upper Rhine a wide range of historical knowledge. The functionalization and refunctionalization of this knowledge will be investigated in this project by way of manuscript and text analysis. In examining alongside the Chronicle of the Council of Constance also other important historical works, which were passed from city to city, and were transformed and adapted similarly, the crosslinking of urban historical writing in the upper Rhine region can be studied.

这个项目提出了一种新的方法来研究上莱茵地区中世纪晚期和近代早期的历史写作。在这本书中，来自历史写作的文本不再被认为是对过去的建构，当局借此寻求使其权力合法化，而是作为城市记忆的一部分，在这种记忆中，过去在不同的社会群体之间进行了历史上的协商。本研究以《君士坦丁会议编年史》，尤其是受其启发的各种形式的历史写作为出发点。《康斯坦茨议会编年史》以其独特的形式记录了1414年至1418年在这座城市举行的国际会议。它是不久之后由乌尔里希·Richental写的，包含了一系列的插图，所有不同的随从的名单和他们的盾形纹章的描绘。编年史在现代研究中受到了很多关注，然而，这些研究主要集中在遗失的原始文本——目击证人的叙述——Richental，尽管最早幸存的手稿只能追溯到15世纪下半叶。虽然大多数学者努力弥合历史传统与会议事件之间的差距，但本项目侧重于手稿中文本的明显配置。本文分析了《纪事录》在15世纪后期出版的原因，证明了《纪事录》在大公会议发生一段时间后仍然具有吸引力。历史写作主题的持续话题性在宗教改革期间接受文本的第二个时期也很明显，当时的人开始将康斯坦茨会议期间作为异教徒被烧死的扬·胡斯的教义与马丁·路德的教义相提并论。《康斯坦茨会议编年史》早已脱离了它的作者，为莱茵河上游各城市的读者提供了广泛的历史知识。这个项目将通过手稿和文本分析的方式来研究这些知识的功能化和再功能化。在考察康斯坦茨议会编年史的同时，也考察其他重要的历史著作，这些著作从一个城市传到另一个城市，并被类似地改造和改编，可以研究莱茵河上游地区城市历史写作的交叉联系。