The New Testament scholars of the Catholic Tübingen School in the 19th century with a specific consideration of the work of Paul von Schanz

在为期两年的资助阶段（2009-2011），该项目考察了19世纪<s:1>宾根大学天主教神学院新约研究教授。在这一资助阶段的第一步，收集了传记和书目信息，在第二步，调查了这些学者的生活和工作。因此，本项目分析了学者们的印刷作品和手写讲稿。新项目将继续已经完成的工作，现在将重点放在学者著作的共同主题上。以下主题将涵盖：1)<s:1>宾根新约学者与新教同行的话语，特别是与年轻的<s:1>宾根学派（新教）的话语；2)以历史耶稣研究为流派的宗派问题的天主教神学话语；(3)方法的悲哀：反犹太教与历史批判；共识范式作为19世纪历史批判释经的一个解释学问题。这四个主题是专门针对<s:1>宾根学者的科学方法，特别是针对保罗·冯·尚兹，他是调查期结束时的关键人物。第一个资助阶段的研究结果主要关注作者本身，这是第二个资助阶段的基础，第二个资助阶段将使用这些研究结果，重点关注上述主题。第二个资助阶段的结果不仅将恢复19世纪释经和神学的全面历史的一部分，而且将阐明20世纪天主教圣经释经的挑战性讨论。

During the biennial stage of funding (2009-2011) the project examined the Professors of New Testament Studies at the Faculty of Catholic Theology of the University of Tübingen in the 19th century. In a first step of this stage of funding the biographical and bibliographical informations were gathered and in a second step the life and the work of these scholars were surveyed. Therefore the project analyzed the printed work as well as the handwritten lecture notes of the scholars. The new project will continue the work that has been done and has its focus now on topics that the writings of the scholars had in common. The following topics will be covered:1) The discourse of the Tübingen New Testament scholars with their Protestant counterparts especially with the Younger Tübingen School (Protestant);2) The discourse of the Catholic Theology with the historical Jesus research as denominational problems of a genre;3) The aporia of the method: Anti-judaism and historical criticism;4) The consensus patrum as a hermeneutical problem for the historical-critical exegesis within the 19th century.These four topics are specific to the scientific approach of the Tübingen scholars especially to Paul von Schanz who is the key figure at the end of the investigation period. The results of the first funding phase, that had a focus on the authors themselves, are the foundation for the second funding phase, that will use these results with a focus on the above-mentioned topics. The results of the second funding phase will not only recover a part of the comprehensive history of exegesis and theology in the 19th century but will also illuminate the challenging discussions of the catholic biblical exegesis of the 20th century.