课题基金 / 基金详情

(New) Political Representative Claims: A Global View (France, Germany, Brazil, China, India)

(New) Political Representative Claims: A Global View (France, Germany, Brazil, China, India)
(新)政治代表主张:全球视野(法国、德国、巴西、中国、印度)
批准号:
281458206
负责人:
Professorin Dr. Brigitte Geißel
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
德国
项目类别:
Research Grants
财政年份:
2016
资助国家:
德国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2015-12-31 至 2020-12-31

项目摘要

项目成果

Professorin Dr. Brigitte Geißel的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Europe currently experiences a crisis of established forms of political representation, visible in increasing political distrust. Various claims to renew political representation are emerging all over the world. Most contemporary research focuses on electoral/mandate representation within single countries. As a result, we lack a comparative, global analysis of (new) representative claims developed outside the representative political system; and dynamics developing in the Global South, including non-democratic entities, are neglected by Western scholars. Our research intends to address these gaps by putting into perspective representative claims in France and Germany, two leading democracies in Europe actively experimenting with new concepts of representation, and in three BRICS states: Brazil, India, and China. Building on German and French political theory, our conceptual framework departs from standard ways of considering political representation in the context of electoral and mandate claims. We argue that while mandate representation remains important, it fails to account for crucial contemporary developments. Our premise is that political representation is increasingly related to the (re)emergence of new representative claims, i.e. situations in which an actor claims to speak/act in the name of others. Such claims are most often based on the denunciation of misrepresentation, which they pretend to correct. However, in spite of the increasing variety of representative claims around the world, a comprehensive conceptual framework and a typology allowing a deeper understanding of these claims are missing and we will address this conceptual gap. In the five countries under scrutiny, we will identify different situations in which (seemingly) new representative claims are raised, criticized or justified. Proceeding through a carefully designed common methodological framework, our research will pursue the objective of analyzing developments of representative claims from a global, transnational perspective. To reach this objective we focus on 2 research fields. (i) representative claims at the national level (national parliaments and media) raised during three national debates in each country; (ii) representative claims raised in three participatory devices at the subnational level. At both levels representative claims are justified with alleged misrepresentation of certain groups within the given representative bodies. We will rest on qualitative methods for data collection and apply the adjusted Representative Claim Analysis for data analyses. To scale up our findings, we will follow the case-thinking approach, identify patterns of representative claims, develop a typology which can be applied for terminological, classificatory and heuristic means, and theorize the findings in the context of modern democratic theory.
期刊论文(7)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
A New Approach to Map and Quantify Representative Claims and Measure Their Validation: A Case Study Analysis
绘制和量化代表性主张并衡量其有效性的新方法:案例研究分析
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2150
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Politics and Governance
影响因子: 2.2
作者: [Joschko, Glaser]
通讯作者: Glaser
Participatory developments in majoritarian and consensus democracies
多数民主和共识民主的参与性发展
DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2018.1495663
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Representation
影响因子: --
作者: [Geissel, Brigitte, Michels]
通讯作者: Michels
Saward’s Concept of the Representative Claim Revisited: An Empirical Perspective
重新审视萨沃德的代表性主张概念:实证视角
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2103
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Politics and Governance
影响因子: 2.2
作者: [Guasti, Geißel, Brigitte]
通讯作者: Brigitte
Claims of Misrepresentation: A Comparison of Germany and Brazil
虚假陈述指控:德国和巴西的比较
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2143
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Politics and Governance
影响因子: 2.2
作者: [Guasti, Almeida, Debora]
通讯作者: Debora
6
    Inequality and Direct Democraty in Europe
    Achievements of dialogic-participatory procedures- Meta-analytical Pilot Study on Participatory Budgeting and Local Agenda 21 in Germany
    海外基金