权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

ProDisG: Professionalism in the focus of discourse-analytical examinations of group discussions - 'references to family' as an integral part of discursive gendering of professional acting under situational and supersituative conditions of statements. (fol

ProDisG：小组讨论的话语分析检查的焦点是专业精神——“提及家庭”是在陈述的情境和取代条件下专业行为的话语性别的一个组成部分。

基本信息

批准号：
283586677
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Susann Fegter
金额：
--
依托单位：
Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2019-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/283586677?language=en
关键词：
ProDisG Professionalism focus discourse analytical

项目摘要

ProDisG is a discourse-analytical study that investigates speaker statements from KiTas and SPFH teams about their work generated in group discussions using a newly developed model for discourse analysis of group discussions from the the project "NeO - (New) Orders of Professionalism and Gender. Discourse-analytical examination of the statements of professionals in a contrastive perspective"(term 09/2016-09/2018). It examines how situational and supersituative conditions of statements made in group discussions form references to family. This has been identified as a central discursive practise constituting ‘professional action’ as a gendered object of knowledge; showing how (re)ordering these fields as 'gendered professions' currently takes place in the context of historical dis/continuities and changed educational and welfare policies. As a follow-up project, ProDisG uses the methodological model, one of the central milestones of the project, which has been successfully developed in NeO. The model makes it possible to think and analyse group discussions from the perspective of discourse theory (in accordance with recent developments in educational discourse research). Situational and supersituative conditions of statements made in group discussions are conceptualized as constitutive elements of discourse as practises, constituting the objects and subjects of knowledge in the act of doing statements: ‘How is it that at this point this statement appears and not others?’ ProDisG use transcripts of group discussion with teams from the two aforementioned fields of action plus a corpus of further material, which includes observation protocols, methodological documents such as letters to the institutions, and the institutions’ concept papers. Thus, the discourse-analytical procedure for the analysis of the statements in group discussions is now fully realized and methodologically critically reflected upon. The guiding questions are: Which insights can be produced with the discourse-analytical procedure? Which possibilities and limits of the methodological heuristic are evident in the practical analysis? How do the analytical steps work in the complex interlinking of different levels and types of material? What situational and supersituative conditions of statements empirically reveal which make 'references to family' an integral part of discursive gendering of professional action in the fields of early education and SPFH?

ProDisG是一项话语分析研究，使用项目“NeO -（新）职业主义和性别秩序”中新开发的小组讨论话语分析模型，调查KiTas和SPFH团队在小组讨论中产生的关于其工作的发言者陈述。话语分析检查的专业人士的陈述在对比的角度”（任期09/2016-09/2018）。它审查了在小组讨论中所作发言的情景和超情景条件如何形成对家庭的提及。这已被确定为一个中央话语的做法构成的“专业行动”作为一个性别的知识对象;显示如何（重新）排序这些领域作为“性别专业”目前发生在历史的不连续性和变化的教育和福利政策的背景下。作为一个后续项目，ProDisG使用方法模型，这是该项目的一个重要里程碑，已在NeO中成功开发。该模式使人们有可能从话语理论的角度来思考和分析小组讨论（根据最近的发展，在教育话语研究）。小组讨论中陈述的情境和超情境条件被概念化为话语的构成要素，即话语，在陈述行为中构成知识的客体和主体：“为什么在这一点上出现这个陈述而不是其他陈述？”ProDisG使用与上述两个行动领域的小组进行的小组讨论的记录，加上一套进一步的材料，其中包括观察议定书、给各机构的信函等方法文件以及各机构的概念文件。因此，在小组讨论中分析发言的话语分析程序现在已经完全实现，并在方法论上进行了批判性的反思。指导性的问题是：哪些见解可以产生与话语分析程序？在实践分析中，方法论启发的哪些可能性和局限性是显而易见的？在不同层次和类型的材料之间复杂的相互联系中，分析步骤是如何工作的？哪些情境和超情境条件的陈述经验性地揭示了“家庭参考”的话语性别化的专业行动在早期教育和SPFH领域的一个组成部分？