权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Higher Education Expansion and the Academization of Employment

高等教育扩张和就业学院化

基本信息

批准号：
316178294
负责人：
Professor Dr. Manfred Stock
金额：
--
依托单位：
Professur Soziologie der Bildung
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2020-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/316178294?language=en
关键词：
Higher Education Expansion Academization Employment

项目摘要

A debate currently playing out in connection with both public and educational policy revolves around an encroaching “over-academization” in Germany, i.e. the growing numbers of college and university graduates, and the ramifications this will have for the labour market. Surprisingly, this discourse only marginally takes research into account which examines the relationship between the ongoing expansion of higher education and the developing trends of its graduates’ employment. Studies have shown that, in contrast to manifold predictions, to date the labour market has in fact absorbed the vast majority of higher education graduates, notwithstanding their growing ranks. Overall, graduates have experienced neither a loss of income nor a downgrading of their positions within the hierarchy of the employment system. As such, this (over-)academization describes not only to the rising numbers and share of academically educated candidates in the labour force, i.e. labour potential. It would also appear that the positions offered have evolved to at least accommodate the new situation brought about by this phenomenon. And while statistical evidence supports the emergence of an academization of both personnel and employment positions, the reasons for this dynamic remain unclear.Using exemplary case studies on selected practice-oriented subjects and occupational fields – e.g. early education, educational therapy and information systems – the research project examines the process of academization and its rationale in connection with the generation of educational potential in postsecondary education, i.e. colleges and universities. It further probes the creation and construction of posts for the academically qualified within the employment system. The aim is to demonstrate if, and if so which, reciprocal referentials exist between the construction and classification of academic labour potential in postsecondary education on the one hand and the construction and classification of jobs in the corresponding fields on the other. In terms of the typification of employment potential, the project will also probe the institution and implementation of application-orientated subjects and degree programmes in conjunction with a respective differentiation of the relevant academic disciplines.It is taken for granted in the current debate on academization that institutions of higher learning address the need for qualified candidates arising in the employment sector. In contrast, the project focuses on whether and to what extent the expansion of high education does not indeed itself produce such a “need” for employment opportunities for academics, which it then satisfies.

目前在公共政策和教育政策方面展开的一场辩论围绕着德国日益严重的“过度学术化”问题展开，即学院和大学毕业生人数的增加及其对劳动力市场的影响。令人惊讶的是，这篇论文只稍微考虑了研究，研究高等教育的持续扩张与毕业生就业发展趋势之间的关系。研究表明，与多方面的预测相反，迄今为止，劳动力市场实际上吸收了绝大多数高等教育毕业生，尽管他们的队伍在不断扩大。总的来说，毕业生既没有失去收入，也没有在就业制度的等级制度中降低职位。因此，这种（过度）学术化不仅反映了劳动力中受过学术教育的候选人的数量和比例不断上升，也就是劳动潜力。此外，所提出的立场似乎也有所变化，至少能够适应这一现象所带来的新情况。虽然统计证据支持人事和就业职位的学术化，但这种动态的原因尚不清楚。教育治疗和信息系统-该研究项目审查了学术化的过程及其与中学后教育中产生教育潜力有关的理由，即学院和大学。并进一步探讨了在聘任制下学术人才岗位的创设与建设。其目的是要证明，如果是这样的话，相互之间的参考存在的建设和分类的学术劳动潜力在中学后教育的一方和建设和分类的工作在相应的领域的另一方。在就业潜力的类型化方面，该项目还将探讨应用型学科和学位课程的设置和实施，以及相关学科的各自区别，在目前关于学术化的辩论中，高等教育机构理所当然地解决就业部门对合格候选人的需求。与此相反，该项目的重点是高等教育的扩张是否以及在多大程度上本身并没有为学者提供就业机会，然后满足这种就业机会的“需要”。