Investigating Potential Relationships between Vocabulary Knowledge and Writing

研究词汇知识与写作之间的潜在关系

• 批准号: 20K00834
• 负责人: Fraser Simon
• 金额: $ 2.83万
• 依托单位: Hiroshima University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2020-04-01 至 2024-03-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-20K00834/
• 关键词: writing; productive vocabulary; lexical diversity; short-term study; IELTS; intervention study; vocabulary knowledge; vocabulary measures

During the past year, our key research involved an investigation into whether productive vocabulary knowledge tasks and writing tasks potentially track changes in vocabulary knowledge development over a short-term (12 week) period of study. We wanted to know the extent to which productive vocabulary knowledge task scores and lexical diversity measure scores explain changes over a short study period, and to what extent the scores relate over this short period.Our results show that all LD measures and one productive vocabulary knowledge task (G_Lex) appear to track vocabulary knowledge growth for our L1 Japanese participants. Correlations show that productive vocabulary knowledge tasks can predict writing levels, but for the pre-test only. For the lexical diversity measure scores, the significant differences between the pre-test and post-test indicate that these measures can, to some extent, show vocabulary increases (assuming greater diversity shows vocabulary usage). Regarding the relation between productive vocabulary knowledge task scores and lexical diversity scores over a short study period, we found that PVK can only predict vocabulary in use at the pre-test, and not the post-test.

在过去的一年里，我们的重点研究包括调查产出性词汇知识任务和写作任务是否潜在地跟踪了短期(12周)学习期间词汇知识发展的变化。我们想知道产出性词汇知识任务分数和词汇多样性测量分数在多大程度上解释了短研究期间的变化，以及这些分数在多大程度上与这一短时间段内的变化有关。结果表明，所有的LD测量和一个产出性词汇知识任务(G_Lex)似乎都跟踪了母语为日语的受试者的词汇知识增长。相关分析表明，产出性词汇知识任务能够预测写作水平，但仅限于前测。对于词汇多样性测试的分数，测试前后的显著差异表明，这些测试在一定程度上可以显示词汇的增加(假设多样性越大，词汇的使用就越多)。关于产出性词汇知识任务分数与词汇多样性分数在短时间内的关系，我们发现PVK只能在前测中预测词汇使用情况，而不能在后测中预测。

项目成果

Can productive vocabulary knowledge measures predict IELTS writing proficiency?

高效词汇知识测量可以预测雅思写作水平吗？

• 发表时间: 2021
• 作者: Yajie Li;Jon Clenton;Simon Fraser
• 通讯作者: Simon Fraser

A Review of McLean’s Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit

麦克莱恩关于采用 Flemma 作为适当字数统计单位的证据的回顾

• DOI: 10.15027/53521
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: 広島外国語教育研究
• 作者: Yajie Li;Simon Fraser;Jon Clenton
• 通讯作者: Jon Clenton

Do vocabulary task measures predict objective or subjective writing scores?

词汇任务测量可以预测客观或主观写作分数吗？

• 发表时间: 2020
• 作者: Yajie Li;Jon Clenton;Simon Fraser
• 通讯作者: Simon Fraser

Peer Commenting on Written Assignments for a Japanese University Online English Course

日本大学在线英语课程书面作业的同行评论

• DOI: 10.15027/53519
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: 広島外国語教育研究
• 作者: Julia Tanabe;Walter Davies;Simon Fraser
• 通讯作者: Simon Fraser

A Review and Evaluation of Suzuki and Kormos’ Investigation into the Link between Cognitive and Utterance Fluency: The Multidimensionality of Second Language Oral Fluency

铃木和科尔莫斯对认知与言语流畅性之间关系的研究回顾与评价：第二语言口语流畅性的多维性

• DOI: 10.15027/53522
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: 広島外国語教育研究
• 作者: 嵐谷恭子;川谷のり子;鎌田真由美;三成拓亜;大谷みどり;猫田英伸;森下美和;Dion Clingwall
• 通讯作者: Dion Clingwall