权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

History of Transparency. Visibility of politics in Germany and France 1890-1990

透明度的历史。

基本信息

批准号：
390185045
负责人：
Professor Dr. Jens Ivo Engels
金额：
--
依托单位：
Université dAvignon et des Pays de Vaucluse
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2018
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2017-12-31 至 2021-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/390185045?language=en
关键词：
History Transparency.Visibility politics Germany

项目摘要

Today, transparency is a political demand which is associated with the progress of democracy, participation and accountability. The current debate often does not reflect two important aspects: First, the quest for transparency is neither entirely new, nor is it a super-temporal category. Rather, it has a history and differs according to social and political contexts. Second, transparency is deeply ambivalent. As there are virtually no historical studies on transparency yet, we focus on the history of political transparency. Transparency is not really a stable feature of a political system. Rather, it is articulated as a demand, concerning above all the access to information, which is considered to make politics 'legible'. The project will concentrate on two empirical fields. First, we will analyse the history of parliamentary inquiry committees between roughly 1890 and 1970. Secondly, we will research two party funding scandals at the end of the 20th century (Flick-Skandal and affaire Urba). We will try to answer the following questions: When did transparency become an effective political demand? What kind of measures has been proposed? Who were the most important actors? Which contexts should be taken into account? Which were the outcomes of the demands for transparency: Did they enhance public knowledge about political processes? Did they strengthen or weaken the confidence in political processes? As a conceptional framework we work with the categories developed by Heald (transparency upwards, downwards, outwards, inwards).We will test the following hypothesis: Demands for transparency developed in the first half of the 20th century and was focused in the first instance on individual cases and politicians. By the 1970s/1980s, the quest for transparency would concern more and more the whole political system, that should systematically develop instruments for transparency beyond individual cases. If this is accurate, there is much to suggest that demands for transparency did not strengthen trust in democratic processes. Beginning with the 1980s, however, there are new political actors entering the scene of transparency politics, demanding new instruments against opacity.The project is intended to carry on the close collaboration the applicants have begun in 2011 in the field of corruption history. As a counter-concept against corruption, transparency will complement ongoing research of the applicants and the project will strengthen their international research network.

今天，透明度是一种政治要求，与民主、参与和问责的进步有关。目前的辩论往往没有反映出两个重要方面：第一，对透明度的追求既不是全新的，也不是一个超时态的范畴。相反，它有一个历史，并根据社会和政治背景而有所不同。其次，透明度令人深感矛盾。由于几乎还没有关于透明度的历史研究，我们把重点放在政治透明度的历史上。透明度并不是政治制度的一个真正稳定的特征。相反，它被表述为一种要求，首先是关于获取信息的问题，这被认为是使政治变得“清晰”的一种要求。该项目将集中在两个经验领域。首先，我们将分析议会调查委员会大约在1890年至1970年之间的历史。其次，我们将研究20世纪末的两起政党资金丑闻(Flick-Skandal和affaire Urba)。我们将努力回答以下问题：透明度什么时候成为一种有效的政治要求？提出了哪些措施？谁是最重要的演员？应该考虑哪些情况？要求透明度的结果有哪些：它们是否提高了公众对政治进程的了解？他们是加强还是削弱了人们对政治进程的信心？作为一个概念框架，我们使用希尔德发展的类别(向上、向下、向外、向内)。我们将检验以下假设：对透明度的需求在20世纪上半叶发展起来，最初集中在个别案件和政客身上。到1970/1980年代，对透明度的追求将越来越多地涉及整个政治制度，这应该系统地制定超越个别案件的透明度文书。如果这是准确的，有很多迹象表明，对透明度的要求并没有加强人们对民主进程的信任。然而，从20世纪80年代开始，有新的政治行为者进入透明政治领域，要求制定新的反不透明工具。该项目旨在继续申请者在2011年开始的腐败历史领域的密切合作。作为反腐败的概念，透明度将补充申请者正在进行的研究，该项目将加强他们的国际研究网络。