Conflict Regulation in the 15th Century. Feuds, Comparisons and Arbitrational Tribunals of the Counts of Nassau-Saarbrücken.

该项目打算提供一个专题论文，分析解决冲突的战略在世纪-妥协和仲裁法庭-在拿骚-萨尔布吕肯县的基础上，进一步讨论在其帝国轴承的相对冲突，并审查有关他们的法律的教育和他们的宫廷关系在法庭外从事法律的解决方案。主要意图是对关于文件的妥协和仲裁法庭进行程序性重建，这些文件定义了多阶段过程（rachtung/anlass/kompromisz），与争议点有关的通信，包括证据（forderungen，antworten，widerreden和nachreden）和契约（entscheidt/spruch/kompromiss）。妥协（fruntlich/mynne/gutlich）和仲裁庭（mynne und recht/frundliches resp. gutliches recht/gewillkurter prozess）允许将这些法律的文书分开。最重要的文件应以印刷和数字形式编辑，因为除了一般的进一步可用性外，（在区域历史、官方语言或区域语言分析中），它们应该被重新用于哥廷根大学数字人文学科主席和数字人文学科中心的一个项目中。以下工作假设变得越来越明显：（1）世仇是解决庄园索赔冲突的三个步骤中的第一步，第二步是在一次会议上进行比较，最后是将未决问题提交仲裁法庭。这种侵略、比较和仲裁法庭解决法律的争端的工作方式是显而易见的。(2)西斯特里奇家族的庄园分裂和许多领土间的冲突可能是拿骚-萨尔布吕肯频繁的庭外法律的解决的放大器。特别是当普通法院的管辖权不明确时，更灵活的仲裁本应是解决冲突的最简单方法。这是为了检查，如果拿骚-萨尔布吕肯是受选举普法尔茨（在那里可以找到类似的文件）关于他们的调整策略的影响。由于定期条款和咨询Einungsverträge和Landfrieden，一个推进制度化的仲裁庭在15世纪，开始于13世纪，应该得到证明。此外，对世俗领域中仲裁法庭起源的讨论也有贡献--假定是罗马规范或dingenossenschaftliches Recht。

The project intends to deliver a monography, which analyses the strategies for settling conflicts in the 15th century – compromise and arbitration tribunal – based on the county of Nassau-Saarbrücken, furthermore discusses the relative conflicts in their imperial bearings and examines the personal engaged in the out-of-court legal settlements concerning their legal education and their courtly connection. A procedural reconstruction of compromises and arbitration tribunals regarding the documents, which define the multistage processes (rachtung/anlass/kompromisz), the correspondence relating to the contentious points including evidence (forderungen, antworten, widerreden and nachreden) and the deeds (entscheidt/spruch/kompromiss) is the central intent. The systematic terms in the rich sources for compromises (fruntlich/mynne/gutlich) and arbitration tribunals (mynne und recht/frundliches resp. gutliches recht/gewillkurter prozess) allow the separation of these legal instruments. The most important documents shall be edited in printed and digital form because, besides general further usability (in the regional history, the officialise or the regional language analysis), they are supposed to be re-used in a project of the chair for Digital Humanities and the Centre of Digital Humanities at the Göttingen University.Following working assumptions are becoming apparent: (1) The feud was the first of three steps for settling conflicts over manorial claims, secondly a comparison was tried during a conference and finally open questions were directed to an arbitration tribunal. Such, a modus operandi of aggression, comparison and arbitrational tribunal for settling legal disputes would be evident. (2) The manorial fragmentation of the Westrich and the many inter-territorial conflicts could have been amplifiers of the frequent out-of-court legal settlements in Nassau-Saarbrücken. Especially when competences of ordinary courts weren’t clear, the more flexible arbitrations should have been the easiest way for settling conflicts. It is to examine, if Nassau-Saarbrücken was influenced by the Electoral Palatinate (where similar documents are to be found) regarding their strategies for adjustments.Due to the regular terms and consulting the Einungsverträge and Landfrieden, an advancing institutionalization of arbitration tribunals in the 15th century, which began in the 13th century, ought to be proved. Also a contribution to the discussion about the origins of arbitrational tribunals in the secular realm – roman-canonical or dingenossenschaftliches Recht are assumed – is possible.