Political Violence in the Federal Republic of Germany.2 June Movement - Revolutionary Cells/Red Zora - Red and Black Aids

该项目调查了三个“新左派”团体，他们迄今为止一直站在英国皇家空军的主导阴影下，无论是在媒体还是在学术研究中。于二零二一年十一月，有关六二运动的子项目已顺利完成。目前（由该项目成员）进行的研究表明，西柏林的一个社会革命团体“革命细胞”（RZ）和西柏林、慕尼黑、法兰克福等地的团结组织“红黑艾滋病”（RSH）的历史。M.，汉堡，科隆，必须重写的基础上，迄今未知的或只有部分探讨来源。这些分项目在分析上侧重于以前被忽视的人类行为学方面。它们可以表明，政治暴力或对政治暴力的支持仅仅是两个群体可以采取的更广泛行动的一部分。此外，还有许多其他的交流和团结做法（例如，出版报纸、组织法律的咨询/援助、伪造票证或为社会边缘化群体的成员擅自占用）。这些做法在当地和随着时间的推移而波动，是跨国和历史转移过程的结果。RZ和RSH最初都借鉴了国际工人运动的历史经验和实践，1968年前后学生领导的抗议活动，以及随后的城市游击队和工厂工作方法。此外，他们进一步发展了这些做法，以换取（其他）武装团体，如6月2日运动，城市左派替代环境，如“非教条”左派团体，和新社会运动，如棚户区。特别是，采取激进的行动形式取决于各自的目标群体：团结工人需要不同的做法，而不是动员自治运动。从在持续的大流行期间在不利的研究条件下汇编的档案资料中，人们可以发现新的个人，主题和行为学从APO到新社会运动的加入。这两个分项目大大扩展了目前的研究状况。他们在历史、社会、空间和话语背景下精心重建了RZ和RSH的历史。因此，除了各个地方团体的具体情况外，它们还揭示了跨区域和跨国的相互联系，并更好地解释了左翼运动历史上的转折点。为了将这些调查结果置于更广泛的经验基础上，并充分挖掘历史知识来源的分析潜力，延长供资期至关重要。

The project investigates three groups of the "New Left" that have so far stood in the dominating shadow of the RAF, both in the media and in academic research. In November 2021, the sub-project on the 2 June Movement was successfully completed. A follow-up application is hereby submitted for the two remaining sub-projects.Research conducted so far (by the members of this project) has shown that the history of the Revolutionary Cells (RZ), a social-revolutionary group in West Berlin, and the so-called Red and Black Aids (RSH), solidarity organizations in West Berlin, Munich, Frankfurt a. M., Hamburg, Cologne, must be rewritten on the basis of hitherto unknown or only partly explored sources. The sub-projects analytically focus on the previously neglected praxeological aspect. They can show that political violence or its support represented only one part of a much broader range of actions available to both groups. In addition, there are many other communicative and solidarity practices (e.g. publishing newspapers, organizing legal advice/aid, forging tickets or squatting for members of socially marginalized groups). Fluctuating both locally and over time, these practices were the result of transnational and historical transfer processes. Both the RZ and the RSH initially drew on the historical experiences and practices of the international workers’ movement, the student-led protests around 1968, and the following approaches to urban guerrilla and factory work. In addition, they further developed these practices in exchange with (other) armed groups such as the 2 June Movement, the urban left-alternative milieu such as the groups of the "undogmatic" left, and New Social Movements such as the squatters. In particular, seizing militant forms of action depended on the respective target groups: Solidarity with the workers required different practices than the mobilization of the autonomous movement.From the archival sources compiled under adverse research conditions during the ongoing pandemic, one can identify new personal, topical and praxeological joins from the APO to the New Social Movements. Both sub-projects considerably extend the current state of research. They meticulously reconstruct the history of the RZ and the RSH in their historical, social, spatial and discursive contexts. Thus, beyond the specifics of the respective local groupings, they reveal cross-regional and transnational interconnections and better explain turning points in the history of leftist movements. To put these findings on a broader empirical basis and to draw out the full analytical potential of sources for historical knowledge, an extension of the funding period is essential.