权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Philosophical Methodology for Deepning Public Dialogues -Centered on Socratic Dialogue

深化公共对话的哲学方法论——以苏格拉底式对话为中心

基本信息

批准号：
14310017
负责人：
NAKAOKA Narifumi
金额：
$ 2.56万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1.As for Socratic Dialogue (in the following : SD), we invited trained and qualified facilitators from Germany and Austria to implement SD sessions, elucidating as a result the efficacy and required improvements of SD as a dialogue methodology.2.As for participatory technology assessment, we implemented researches on related literature focusing on European cases. ; established a working group with special concern on science and technology problems in order to investigate specific issues and to clarify what kind of dialogue models -including consensus conferences and science shops -are best suited for problem solutions.3.As for biotechnological themes including xenotransplantation, we let Dr. Beate Littig, with whom we have had close contact as co-researchers, give us a final report on her research project in the European Union ; she was, however, rather negative about the efficacy of using SD for public dialogues ; we therefore proposed our own dialogue model of Dialogue Complex, mentioned later, to investigate its significance together.4.We developed "Dialogue Complex" as a dialogue model composed of four stages including SD," implemented it on a medical theme in order to clarify its efficacy and required improvements.5.We organized the second "Dialogue Symposium" (Osaka University, Jan. 11, 2004) in order to coordinate a forum, where various dialogue trials of citizens could be compared with one another and be investigated.

1.对于苏格拉底式对话（以下简称SD），我们邀请了来自德国和奥地利经过培训且合格的辅导员来实施SD会议，从而阐明了SD作为对话方法论的有效性和需要改进的地方。2.对于参与式技术评估，我们以欧洲案例为重点进行了相关文献的研究。 ;成立了一个特别关注科学技术问题的工作组，以调查具体问题，并明确什么样的对话模式——包括共识会议和科学商店——最适合解决问题。 3.关于异种移植等生物技术主题，我们让与我们作为共同研究员密切接触的Beate Littig博士向我们提交了她在欧盟的研究项目的最终报告；然而，她对使用 SD 进行公共对话的功效相当消极；因此，我们提出了我们自己的对话模型（稍后提到的对话复合体），以共同研究其意义。4.我们开发了“对话复合体”作为由包括SD在内的四个阶段组成的对话模型，并将其应用于医学主题，以明确其功效和需要改进的地方。5.我们组织了第二次“对话研讨会”（大阪大学，2004年1月11日），以协调一个论坛，在该论坛中，公民的各种对话试验可以与一个对话试验进行比较另一个并被调查。