权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Abstractness and Concreteness of Philosophical Theories-centered on Hegel's philosophy and Nursing Theories

哲学理论的抽象性与具体性——以黑格尔哲学与护理理论为中心

基本信息

批准号：
12610004
负责人：
NAKAOKA Narifumi
金额：
$ 2.5万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2001
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

The present research project Centered this year on philosophical possibilities of Socratic Dialogues (in the following: SD), a methodology of philosophical group work, both in theoretical and in practical field. In SD, participants try to stick to everyday concrete experiences and to take, in collaboration with each other, a general meaning out of the experienced, after formulating it as clearly as possible, listening to other participants, and asking each other questions. In the process mediated by the facilitator, the experienced undergoes a transformation from its initial privateness to a sort of publicness. It has also been elucidated in the present study what kind of approach is requested on the part of the facilitator, specifically against the Japanese cultural background, which is different from that of Germany, the birthplace of SD. In addition, it has been reported about a research project running in EU on applying SD to participatory technology assessment; opinion exchanges have been made with European SD representatives in order to prepare for similar researches in Japan. As for the kind of reason, not standing aloof from cultural contexts, but relevant to various fields of social care such as nursing, it is requested to rely on the concreteness of each field while avoiding confining itself to the field. Such kind of reason should namely be wise enough to tackle generalizing work while at the same time always conscious of its limit.In relation to Hegel's philosophy, the present project has dealt with Hajime Tanabe's Logic of absolute mediation, a forerunner to contemporary logics of difference, showing its inability to involve itself to concreteness of social fields.

本研究项目今年集中在苏格拉底对话的哲学可能性（以下：SD），哲学小组工作的方法论，无论是在理论上还是在实践领域。在SD中，参与者试图坚持日常的具体经验，并在尽可能清晰地表达出来，倾听其他参与者并相互提问之后，相互合作，从经验中获得一般意义。在促进者的调解过程中，被体验者经历了从最初的私密性到某种公共性的转变。本研究还阐明了在与可持续发展的发源地德国不同的日本文化背景下，对促进者的要求是什么样的方法。此外，据报道，在欧盟运行的一个研究项目，应用SD参与技术评估，意见交流与欧洲SD代表，以准备在日本进行类似的研究。至于那种不脱离文化背景，而是与护理等社会关怀的各个领域相关的原因，则要求依赖于每个领域的具体性，同时避免局限于该领域。这样的理性应该是明智的，足以处理一般化的工作，同时始终意识到它的局限性。关于黑格尔的哲学，本项目处理的是田边的绝对中介逻辑，现代差异逻辑的先驱，表明它无法涉及到社会领域的具体性。