权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

The Acquisition Mechanism of Perception and Pronunciation of Plosives by East-Asian Learners of Japanese : A Study of Interlanguage

东亚日语学习者对塞音的感知和发音的习得机制:中介语研究

基本信息

批准号：
15520333
负责人：
FUKUOKA Masako
金额：
$ 1.28万
依托单位：
Mie University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Based on the following three investigations, four papers and five oral presentations at academic conferences were prepared to show research results (1) through (5) below.Longitudinal study on perception and pronunciation of plosives by Korean learners of Japanese (July 2003--February 2004) ; Interlingual investigation on the categorical perception of plosives using the synthesized variations of voice onset time (VOT) at Tianjin Foreign Studies University and Shanghai International Studies University, of China, and Kyung Hee University, of Korea (February--March 2004) ; Research on plosives and accents at Kyung Hee University (September 2004) and Tongji University, in Shanghai (January 2005).(1) It is commonly difficult for East-Asian learners of Japanese to acquire perception and pronunciation of plosives. As for learners from Korea (Seoul-dialect speakers), where less research has been performed from the standpoints of perception and pronunciation, they experience a severe problem in … More pronunciation. This reveals the possibility that they understand the voiced plosives of Japanese words to be lax in pronunciation, much like the word initials of Korean. In perception, they hear voiceless plosives in the word initials of Japanese that appear to be similar to the forced sounds of Korean. Based on these data, the mechanism of acquisition containing the major factors of confusion in the learning of Japanese was successfully clarified.(2) Acoustic-phonetic analysis of the Beijing-dialect, the Shanghai-dialect, and the Seoul-dialect of Korean speakers revealed that the acquisition of perception and pronunciation differ. Shanghai-dialect speakers acquired both perception and pronunciation first ; Beijing-dialect speakers had the most difficulty. In perception, Beijing- and Shanghai- dialect speakers misheard voiceless plosives in the middle of words as voiced plosives, but Korean speakers misheard voiceless plosives in word initials as voiced plosives. In regards to pronunciation, it was difficult for all speakers to pronounce voiced plosives in word initials. Shanghai-dialect and Korean speakers, who had voiced plosives in their native languages, pronounced them as the voiceless unaspirated sounds and as the lax word initials of their native languages, respectively.(3) In the acquisition by Korean learners of perception and pronunciation of plosives, there was also first language (L1) interference related to accents. As a result of an examination using fundamental frequency, it was revealed that a word including a voiceless plosive at its initial was pronounced in the high-low pitch pattern. A word including a voiced plosive at its initial, however, was pronounced in the middle-high pitch pattern, with the first mora low in pitch and the subsequent mora rising.(4) When the categorical perception of Japanese plosives by Beijing-dialect, Shanghai-dialect, and Korean speakers studying Japanese was examined by means of synthesized variations with different voice onset times (VOT), it was found that the categorical perception of Beijing- and Shanghai-dialect speakers was similar to that of native speakers of Japanese when a plosive was included in a word initial. However, Korean speakers corresponded to native speakers of Japanese when a plosive was in the middle of a word. These results revealed different categorical perceptions among languages.(5) The process of shaping an interlanguage in the acquisition of plosives was examined through the developmental processes, such as including interference and approximation. As a result, it was found that the Ontogeny Model for second language (L2) acquisition developed by Mayor (1997) could not be applied to all situations, and it was believed to have contributed to the construction of the interlanguage theory. Less

基于以下三项调查，准备了四篇论文和五篇学术会议口头报告，展示了以下研究结果（1）至（5）。韩国日语学习者对爆破音感知和发音的纵向研究（2003年7月--2004年2月）；在中国的天津外国语大学和上海外国语大学以及韩国的庆熙大学，利用语音起始时间（VOT）的综合变化对爆破音的分类感知进行语际调查（2004年2月-2004年3月）；庆熙大学（2004年9月）和上海同济大学（2005年1月）对爆破音和口音的研究。（1）东亚日语学习者普遍很难获得爆破音的感知和发音。对于来自韩国（首尔方言）的学习者来说，从感知和发音的角度进行的研究较少，他们在发音方面遇到了严重的问题。这表明他们可能认为日语单词的浊塞音在发音上很松散，就像韩语单词的声母一样。在感知中，他们听到日语单词首字母中的清爆破音，这似乎与韩语的强迫发音相似。基于这些数据，成功地阐明了日语学习中的主要混乱因素的习得机制。(2)对北京话、上海话和首尔方言的朝鲜语使用者进行声学语音分析，发现感知和发音的习得存在差异。上海话使用者首先获得感知和发音；北京话的人遇到的困难最大。在感知上，北京话和上海话使用者将单词中间的清爆破音误听为浊爆破音，而韩语使用者则将词首中的清爆破音误听为浊爆破音。在发音方面，所有说话者都很难发出单词首字母中的浊塞音。上海话和韩语使用者，在母语中存在浊爆破音，则分别将其读为母语的清不送气音和松散词声母。(3)韩语学习者对爆破音的感知和发音习得过程中，也存在与口音相关的母语(L1)干扰。使用基频进行检查的结果表明，在其词首包含清爆破音的单词以高低音调模式发音。然而，一个词首包含浊爆破音的单词，其发音为中高音模式，第一个音节音低，随后的音节上升。(4)当通过不同语音开始时间(VOT)的合成变化来检验北京话、上海话和学习日语的韩国人对日语爆破音的分类感知时，发现分类感知当词首包含爆破音时，北京话和上海话使用者的感知与日语母语者的感知相似。然而，当单词中间有爆破音时，韩语使用者与日语母语使用者相对应。这些结果揭示了不同语言之间不同的分类感知。(5)通过干扰和近似等发展过程来考察爆破音习得中中介语的形成过程。结果发现，Mayor（1997）提出的第二语言（L2）习得本体论模型不能适用于所有情况，并且被认为有助于中介语理论的构建。较少的

项目成果

期刊论文数量（24）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Plosive Acquisition Study of Korean Learners of Japanese-The Mechanism of Perception and Pronunciation-

韩国日语学习者的爆破习得研究-感知和发音的机制-

DOI：
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
Autumn Annual Meeting 2005, The Society for Teaching Japanese
影响因子：
0
作者：
中西久実子;福岡昌子;札野寛子;松永典子;福岡昌子;山田敏弘;野田尚史;札野寛子;前田直子;松永典子;福岡昌子;中西久実子;Hiroko Fudano;中西久実子;山田敏弘;福岡昌子;Noriko Matsunaga;野田尚史;Hiroko Fudano;山田敏弘;Fukuoka Masako;Noriko Matsunaga;熊谷明泰;野田尚史;札野寛子;Fukuoka Masako;山田敏弘;松永典子;札野寛子;熊谷明泰;山田敏弘;Fukuoka Masako
通讯作者：
Fukuoka Masako

韓国人日本語学習者の破裂音習得-知覚と生成-

韩国日语学习者爆破音的习得——感知和产生——