VALPLAN - Values and valuing in political spatial planning processes

Valplan - 政治空间规划过程中的价值观和评估

• 批准号: 463567980
• 负责人: Professor Dr.-Ing. Christian Diller
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Fachgebiet Stadt- und Regionalplanung
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/463567980?language=en
• 关键词: VALPLAN; Values; valuing; political; spatial

The reasearch-project deals with two gaps in planning theory: on the one hand the question of processes of weighting, on the other hand the handling with questions of values and processes of value-aggregation. These questions mainly are relevant in the planning-phase of consideration of and choice between planning alternatives. Indeed this phase has a central position in the classic model of the planning process, but is partly no longer explicitly named in recent planning-theory approaches und stays underexposed as a „black box“ in plenty empirical investigations on planning practice. The following research questions are put in focus: How are varieties handled in planning processes? Which methods are therefore applied? Which meaning, impacts, advantages and disadvantages do several planning methods of several planning-theory models (rational, incremental, strategic, communicative) have related to the handling of planning-alternatives? In which way does the communicative setting of the application of methods of alternative-consideration and the combination with methods of the communicative plannig model have an influence on their impact? Which individual and institutional values play a role in consideration-processes? How do planner handle (divergent) questions of values? How do collective processes of value aggregation occur and which methods therein have which functions? How can formalized planning-methods of the several planning models for handling varieties can be designed in a communicative manner and thereby get optimized? How can particularly methods of valuating und decisioning can be developed in a communicative manner?As a follow-up of two DFG-founded projects, who wer concernend on the one hand with the everyday life of planners and on the other hand with planning methods, this project draws near its issue with several methodological approaches: Firstly with inhouse experiments with students; secondly with eight ex-post case studes as well as from the area-orientated legal planning as from the project-orientated informal development planning; thirdly with focus-group-discussions with experts from planning practice.

该研究项目涉及规划理论中的两个空白：一方面是加权过程问题，另一方面是价值和价值聚集过程问题的处理。这些问题主要与规划阶段有关，即在规划方案之间进行考虑和选择。事实上，这一阶段在规划过程的经典模型中占有中心地位，但在最近的规划理论方法中，这一阶段在一定程度上已不再被明确提及，而且在大量规划实践的实证调查中，这一阶段仍未被充分暴露为“黑箱”。以下研究问题是重点：在规划过程中如何处理品种？因此应用了哪些方法？几种规划理论模型（理性的、增量的、战略的、沟通的）的几种规划方法对规划备选方案的处理有哪些意义、影响、优缺点？应用替代考虑方法的交际设置和与交际计划模型方法的结合对其影响有哪些影响？哪些个人价值观和制度价值观在考虑过程中发挥作用？策划者如何处理（不同的）价值观问题？价值聚集的集体过程是如何发生的，其中哪些方法具有哪些功能？如何才能以交流的方式设计几种处理品种的规划模型的形式化规划方法，从而得到优化？评估和决策的具体方法如何以交流的方式发展？作为dfg创立的两个项目的后续，他们一方面关注规划师的日常生活，另一方面关注规划方法，该项目通过几种方法方法接近其问题：首先是学生的内部实验；其次，通过八个事后案例分析，从面向区域的法律规划和面向项目的非正式发展规划两方面进行分析；第三，与规划实践专家进行焦点小组讨论。