State-Led-Gentrification: Settings and Impacts of the application of urband-development-policy-instruments in quarters with tendencies of upgrading and displacement

国家主导的绅士化：城市发展政策工具在有升级和迁移倾向的地区应用的背景和影响

• 批准号: 512672234
• 负责人: Professor Dr.-Ing. Christian Diller
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Arbeitsgebiet Angewandte Geographie und Raumplanung
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 资助国家: 德国
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/512672234?language=en
• 关键词: State; Led; Gentrification; Settings; Impacts

The question of the influence of strategic instruments of urban development on gentrification-processes in large city quarters either in Germany has a high topicality but is rarely systematically examinated. Does the use oft he instruments of urban renewal accelerate gentrification-processes, are those politically desirable or not? What are the impacts of instrument which were developed explicitly for containing residential milieus by decelerating gentrification? In this research project the questions oft he political background, the processes and impacts of the use of the instruments are examined in a comparative and partly generalizing perspective.The research-project has the following leading questions:1. What are the findings on the estate-economical und social upgrading of quarters in German large cities in variation in time?2. Are there certain patterns of upgrading be recognizend by comparison of the cities and quarters?3. Which forms of displacement in which degree can be recognized in quarters with particular uprading-.tendencies?4. To what extent can upgrading and displacement-processes in quarters are caused by the impacts of instruments of urban policy?5. What had been the backgrounds and motives for the application of instruments of urban policy; what had been the connected political disputes?6. Can gentrrification be controlled and eventually decelerated and if yes, by which means?In the statistical analysis of the first module the 35 largest and most dynamic German towns will be included. Thereby the housing-economical und socio-structural development data of all in all about 1900 quarters will be analysed; whereat the question of the application of urban policy-instruments will be included.On this base the quartes will be typizised and afterwards 15 selected quartes in 5 towns will be examinated as case studies. Thereby in the second module a representatiove survey among the people who left the quartes will be executed to find out the reasons for the draws.In module 3 an analysis of the application of the urban policcy-instruments and a media-discourse-analysis to the question of gentrification in the quarters will be done. In module 4 the findings will be collected together: Determination of the connection of upgrading and displacement, analysis of the interdependencies of instrumental-.application and gentrification, assessment of the chnces and limitations of urban-policy interventions.

城市发展战略工具对德国大城市街区绅士化进程的影响问题具有很高的话题性，但很少有系统的研究。城市更新工具的使用是否加速了中产阶级化进程，这些在政治上是否可取？通过减缓中产阶级化，明确为遏制住宅环境而开发的工具有什么影响？本研究从比较和部分概括的角度，对工具使用的政治背景、过程和影响等问题进行了研究。 德国大城市住宅区的房地产经济和社会升级在时间上的变化有什么发现？2. 通过城市和地区的比较，是否存在某些升级模式？3. 在具有特定上升趋势的地区，可以识别出哪些形式的位移，在何种程度上？4. 城市政策工具的影响在多大程度上可以导致住宅区的升级和置换过程？5. 应用城市政策工具的背景和动机是什么;与此相关的政治争端是什么？6. 中产阶级化能否得到控制并最终减速？如果是，通过何种手段？在第一个模块的统计分析中，将包括35个最大和最具活力的德国城镇。因此，将对大约1900个街区的住房经济和社会结构发展数据进行分析;在此基础上，将包括城市政策工具的应用问题。在此基础上，将对街区进行典型化，然后将对5个城镇的15个选定街区进行案例研究。因此，在第二模块中，我们将对离开街区的人进行一次有代表性的调查，以找出吸引他们的原因。在第三模块中，我们将对城市警察工具的应用进行分析，并对街区绅士化问题进行媒体话语分析。在模块4中，调查结果将被收集在一起：确定升级和流离失所的联系，分析工具的相互依赖性。应用和绅士化，评估城市政策干预的机会和局限性。