权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study on Sources of Contemporary International Law

当代国际法渊源研究

基本信息

批准号：
60520015
负责人：
FUJITA HISAKAZU
金额：
$ 0.51万
依托单位：
KANSAI UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1985
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1985 至 1986
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-60520015/
关键词：
Sources treaty United Nations General Assembly resolution United Nations Charter Institute of International Law international legislation 多数国間条約

项目摘要

1. This Study concentrates on considerations of the sources of international law. Traditional sources, that is, treaty, custom and general principles of law, by their formalism do not sufficiently adapt themselves to the changing international community. There are two approaches: one is to examine legal effects of United Nations resolutions as a new source, and another is to seek possible international legislation as world-wide law-making.2. U.N.General Assemly resolutions have only recommendatory nature according to the U.N. Charter. But, some authors try to give quasi-legislative function to the General Assembly and to rcognize legal nature of some resolutions. Recently, the Institute of International Law discussed this topic. Reports presented to the Institute deal with normative resolutionbs which contain general and abstract rules of conduct and the conclusions cover the procedures and techniques of elaboration and the legal consequences of such resolutions.3. International legislation is almost impossible in the actual structure of international law and in absence of international legislative organ. But, multilateal treaties of general interest have been increased in spite of the principle of "pacta tertiis nec nocent nec prosunt". The effect of quasi-international legislation is expected through the review and amelioration of multilateral treaty-making process.

1. 本研究集中于对国际法渊源的考虑。传统来源，即条约、习惯和一般法律原则，由于其形式主义，不能充分适应不断变化的国际社会。有两种方法：一种是作为新的来源审查联合国决议的法律效力，另一种是寻求可能的国际立法作为世界范围的立法。根据《联合国宪章》，联合国大会的决议只有建议性质。但是，一些作者试图赋予大会准立法职能，承认一些决议的法律性质。最近，国际法研究所讨论了这个问题。向研训所提出的报告涉及载有一般和抽象行为规则的规范性决议，结论则涉及拟订程序和技术以及这些决议的法律后果。在国际法的实际结构和缺乏国际立法机构的情况下，国际立法几乎是不可能的。但是，尽管有“非条约即无协议”的原则，具有普遍利益的多边条约却有所增加。准国际立法的效果可以通过审查和改进多边条约制定过程来实现。