权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Anthropology of China-An Annotated Bibliography of Bibliographies and Other Basic Works-

中国人类学-书目及其他基础著作注释书目-

基本信息

批准号：
02301047
负责人：
SUENARI Michio
金额：
$ 3.33万
依托单位：
Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Co-operative Research (A)
财政年份：
1990
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1990 至 1991
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This project has been started by aiming at filling the absence of reliable aid for anthropological studies of China. The anthropology of China has a short history especially in Japan, we have few guide books, tool books, and references. This is not only obstacle to novice but also to scholars of neighboring area of study. The need for such tool became more deeply realized recently when the flood of anthropological data began to be published. It would have been a reckless effort to choose whole China in such a short period by relatively small group. But, someone must start and it would be of use as a basis for further more complete work.This is composed by 1. introductory retrospect of the study of each area, 2. annotated bibliography of basic references and works (M), 3. selected annotated bibliography of bibliographies (K). It is also found useful to include some books and papers that contain a good bibliography (R).This is the result of cooperation of 24 members. All are Chinese spec … More ialists with field experience in China. Even though they are not of the same profession, all of them have been interested in anthropology. We have had 9 general meetings from 6/24'1989 to 10/10'1991. We discussed on purpose, items, format and technical matters such as the process of input by word-processor. After the meeting participants worked along the line decided at the meeting and sent data in the form of floppy disk. They were put into the data base and printed out for the next meeting. This process has both merits and demerits. A merit is it enabled us to concentrate ourselves into more effective work, and a demerit is the content and quality has slightly changed with the stages of the whole process. A careful reader might notice some difference in tone in K, R and H as well as personal difference of style. We have had no time to rewrite fully on the same criteria nor to edit. In future, we hope to publish in more complete manner.The editor of this book hopes it will not only be used by the novice and professionals in adjacent area but also make for furthering international cooperation. Less

该项目旨在填补中国人类学研究缺乏可靠援助的情况。中国的人类学发展历史较短，尤其是日本，我们的人类学指导书、工具书和参考文献都很少。这不仅对初学者是一种障碍，对邻近研究领域的学者也是一种障碍。随着大量人类学数据的发表，人们越来越深刻地认识到需要这样的工具。在这么短的时间内，由一个相对较小的群体选择整个中国，这将是一个鲁莽的努力。但是，必须有人开始，它将作为进一步更完整的工作的基础使用。这是由1.各领域研究的介绍性回顾; 2.基本参考文献和著作的注释书目（M），3.参考书目的选定注释书目（K）。此外，还发现列入一些载有良好参考书目（R）的书籍和论文也很有用，这是24名成员合作的结果。全部为中国规格 ...更多信息具有中国实地经验的专家。尽管他们不是同一专业，但他们都对人类学感兴趣。从1989年6月24日至1991年10月10日，我们共举行了9次大会。我们讨论了目的、项目、格式和技术问题，如文字处理机的输入过程。会后，与会者沿着会议决定的路线工作，并以软盘的形式发送数据。它们被存入数据库，并打印出来供下次会议使用。这一过程既有优点，也有缺点。优点是它使我们能够集中精力进行更有效的工作，缺点是内容和质量随着整个过程的阶段略有变化。一个细心的读者可能会注意到K、R和H中的音调差异以及个人风格的差异。我们没有时间完全按照同样的标准重写，也没有时间编辑。今后，我们希望以更完整的方式出版，本书的编辑希望它不仅能被新手和邻近地区的专业人士使用，而且有助于进一步的国际合作。少