War-time Mobilization and Structural Change--Comparative Analysis--

联合研究项目围绕三组活动取得进展，具体而言：（1）邀请海外项目成员参加每年7月在东京外国语大学举行的国际研讨会;（2）派遣日本成员参加9月或10月在德国和美国举行的会议：（3）日本与海外学术界之间为了研究咨询和数据收集而进行的频繁交流。（1）所述的活动主要是从比较德国和日本的角度进行的。他们邀请德国研究人员参加研讨会，并集中讨论两国的战时动员系统及其对战后社会的影响。我们首先考虑战时制度和战后社会之间的结构连续性和面包。然后，对性别问题的兴趣加深了。我们随后的调查 关于我们 这两个国家的历史代表性和社会意识。本研究的结果是，以往被认为是独特或独特的两国战时和战后社会，现在更应该被视为大致相同的社会结构。在（2）中，我们进行了比较研究，特别是对“日本的牺牲”这一主题进行了比较研究，并报道了德国的现状，日本和美国。尽管对“日本现代性”的研究状况受到不同学者所处的不同社会条件的强烈规定，但很明显，可以看出某些深层次的共同点。因此，“日本研究”领域被共同项目的学者们认为，如果研究者们被“国家”观点所限制，那么“日本研究”领域就不会取得进展。在（3）中，上述（1）和（2）的结果得到了深化，特别是，具体的问题，并通过对联合研究项目的贡献者的各种研究主题的深入发展，在它们之间建立有机的联系。最后，将于1998年开始的下一代联合研究项目所应涉及的许多课题也在这里出现。少

The joint research project has progressed centering around three sets of activities, specifically : (1) the invitation of overseas project members to international symposia held every year in July at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies : (2) the dispatch of Japanese members to conferences held in Germany and the USA in Septembers or October : (3) the frequent exchange of Japanese and overseas academics for purposes of research consultations and the collection of data.The activities described at (1) have mainly taken place from the perspective of a comparison of Germany and Japan. They have involved inviting German researches to the symposia, and have lead to concentrated discussions on the war-time mobilizations systems of both countries and the effects of this on their post-war societies. We began by considering the structural continuities and breads between the war-time systems and post-war societies. Then, interest in questions of gender deepened. Our investigations subsequently … More progressed to consider historical representation and social consciousness in both countries. Our result of this study has been that the war-time and post-war societies of both countries, which have hitherto tended to be regarded as being unique or particular, have come to be more appropriately seen as in large part sharing general structure.At (2), we have undertaken comparative investigations, especially into the theme of 'Japan Studies', and have reported on the current state of affairs in Germany, Japan and the USA.In spite of the fact that the state of research into 'Japanese modernity'is strongly prescribed by the varied social conditions in which different scholars operate, it has become apparent that certain deep-level commonalities can be discerned. Thus, the field of 'Japan Studies'has been recognized by scholars from the joint project as not progressing if researchers are restricted by a "national" view-point.At (3), the results emanating from (1) and (2) above have been deepened in comformith with particular, concrete questions and have developed through the deepening of the various research themes of the contributors to the joint research project and the creating og the organic connections between them. Finally, many of the subjects which ought to be engaged by the next-generation joint research project, which will begin from 1998, have emerged here. Less