The responsibility of a party for stating facts and producing evidences, who has no burden of proof or persuation.

当事人有陈述事实、举证的责任，不承担举证、说服责任。

• 批准号: 08620038
• 负责人: MATSUMOTO Hiroyuki
• 金额: $ 1.41万
• 依托单位: OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1996 至 1997
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-08620038/
• 关键词: civil procedure; clarification of issues; burden of proof or persuation; the responsibility of producing facts and evidences; the party who has no burden of proof or persuation; 民事訴訟法; 当事者

In civil procedure, it must be clarified what facts the parties dispute about. In the light of that purpose, how concretely does the plainitiff need to explain the facts his or her claims is basesd on? May the defendant merely such facts without any concrete statement?If they are required concretely to explain or state such facts, it would be an essential problem what effect non-concreteness of the explanation or statement would have from the legal point of view. And when one party has a burden of proof or persuation, but does not have access to necessary information, it would be desiable that, under proper conditions, the other party who has the information should take the responsability for co-operation with the one party in explaining facts and producing evidences.Since the other party, however, does not originally have a burden of persuation and producing facts and evidences such as would be disadvantageous to himself or herself, it would be a very important problem, under what con … More ditions he or she should take the above responsibility.I have tried in this research to solve the last problem, surveying the developments of German and Japanese precedents. First, I have followed German precedents which have forced and developed the doctrine imposing the responsibility of producing facts and evidences on the party who has no burden of proof or persuation, and analyzed German scholars' theories relating to theses precedents. Second, I have analyzed the content of the responsibility of stating facts, which has been imposed on the same party as above in practice of Japanese environment or taxation litigation.Finally, I have concluded that, if(1) one party who has a burden of proof or persuation, is out of affairs ; and(2) he or she has no possibility of explaining facts for himself or herself ; but(3) the other party can easily explan the facts ; and(4) he or she can be expected to do so from the viewpoint of circumstances concerned, the other party should be responsibility by bona-fide or good faith rule for stating facts concretely and producing rerlevant, eridences, in Japanese civil procedure, too. Less

在民事诉讼中，必须明确当事人争议的事实。根据这一目的，原告需要如何具体地解释他或她的主张所依据的事实？被告是否可以只陈述这些事实而不作任何具体陈述？如果要求他们具体解释或陈述这些事实，从法律的观点来看，解释或陈述的不具体性会产生什么影响，这将是一个基本问题。当一方当事人负有举证责任或说服责任，但又无法获得必要的信息时，在适当的条件下，应当由掌握信息的另一方当事人承担与一方当事人合作解释事实和提供证据的责任，但由于另一方当事人，本来就没有说服和提出对自己不利的事实和证据的负担，这将是一个非常重要的问题，在什么情况下， ...更多信息 在本研究中，我试图解决最后一个问题，调查德国和日本先例的发展。首先，笔者遵循了德国判例对无举证责任人承担事实和证据责任原则的推动和发展，并分析了德国学者对这些判例的相关理论。其次，笔者分析了日本环境税诉讼实践中对同一当事人所规定的事实陈述责任的内容，最后得出结论：（1）负有举证责任或说服责任的一方当事人无正当理由，（2）没有为自己说明事实的可能性，（3）当事人没有为自己说明事实的能力，（4）当事人没有为自己说明事实的能力，（5）当事人没有为自己说明事实的能力，（6）当事人没有为自己说明事实的能力，（7）当事人没有为自己说明事实的能力。但（3）对方当事人能够轻易地解释事实;（4）从有关情况来看，可以期望他或她这样做，根据善意或诚实信用规则，另一方当事人也应该承担具体陈述事实并提供相关证据的责任，在日本民事诉讼中也是如此。少

项目成果

Hiroyuki MATSUMOTO: "Zut Struktur des japanischen Zivilprozesses mach der ZivilprozeBordrung von 1996" Zeitschrift fur Zivilprozeβ International. Bd.2. (1998)

Hiroyuki MATSUMOTO：“Zut Struktur des japanischen Zivilprozesses mach der ZivilprozeBordrung von 1996”Zeitschrift for Zivilprozeβ Bd.2 (1998)。

松本博之: "民事訴訟における証明責任を負わない当事者の具体的事実陳述=証拠提出義務について" 法曹時報. 49巻7号. 1-41 (1997)

松本博之：“关于不承担举证责任的当事人提交具体事实陈述的义务=民事诉讼中的证据”，Hoso Jiho，第49卷，第7.1-41号（1997年）。

松本 博之: "民事訴訟における証明責任を負わない当事者具体的事実陳述=証拠提出義務について" 法曹時報. 49巻7号. 1-41 (1997)

松本博之：“关于民事诉讼中不负有举证责任的当事人陈述具体事实的义务=提交证据”Hoso Jiho，Vol. 49，No. 7. 1-41 (1997)

松本博之: "民事訴訟における当事者の自己決定" 松本博之=西谷敏編・現代社会と自己決定権(信山社). 383-407 (1997)

Hiroyuki Matsumoto：“民事诉讼当事人的自决”由 Hiroyuki Matsumoto 和 Satoshi Nishitani 编辑，《现代社会与自决权》（Shinzansha）383-407（1997）。

MATSUMOTO,Hiroyuki: "The responsibility of the party for stating facts and producing evidences, who has no burden of proof or persuation" Hoso Jiho. Vol.49 No.7. 1-41 (1997)

松本博之：“当事人有陈述事实和举证的责任，没有举证或说服的责任”Hoso Jiho。