Comparative Political Analysis on Global Environmental Network in Western and Asian Countries

内部研究，也称为全球环境政策网络（GEPON）研究，是在复杂的政策领域进行的，使用网络方法进行比较和跨国调查和分析。本研究旨在揭示欧洲和亚洲主要国家以及美国在政策形成过程中的结构差异和特征。为此，在日本、美国、德国、韩国等发达国家，以75个（至少50个以上）组织为对象进行了访谈，并将国际组织作为全球环境政策运动的参与者。实际上，日本、韩国、德国和美国的100多个协会、组织和研究所都可以接受调查。调查内容可分为四个主要部分：第一部分是关于信息交换关系（网络）和资源交换关系（网络）， ...更多信息 目标组织;第二部分涉及从1980年代到进行调查时（1997年至2000年）环境政策方面的主要事件以及目标组织对这些问题的立场;第三部分涉及目标组织内部结构的信息;第四部分涉及国际组织之间网络关系的调查。通过这一调查和分析，主要针对所有的行为者群体，本研究通过确定国内和国际信息和资源交流过程，探讨每个国家的全球环境政策是如何形成的。每一个行动者群体都可以根据是否有包含所有特征的政策承认来区分，并可以根据比较政治来定位。通过这种分析，可以从结构上解释每个国家和每个国际组织在全球环境政策方面的差异，或者可以具体说明结构因素的重要性。本研究是对“全球环境政策”进行全面的“比较”与“网络分析”，就这三点而言，是一项特别有价值的实证分析。这项研究不仅确定了各国在这一领域的结构差异，而且即使从政治学的角度来看，它也是一项雄心勃勃的研究，揭示了在大规模的全球网络结构中，包括非政府组织在内的国际和国内政治在结构上的相互渗透。相关的案例研究也列入了关于这项研究的报告。少

The within study, also known as the GEPON (Global Environmental Policy Network) Study is conducted on the complex policy field using a network approach to undertake comparative and transnational surveys and analyses. This study aims to reveal the structural differences and features in each country's policy formation process for major nations in Europe and Asia, as well as the United States. For that reason, interviews targeting 75 (at least over 50) organizations were conducted in each country in Japan, the United States, Germany, South Korea, as well as other advanced nations, and involved international organizations as actors in the global environmental policy movement. In fact, over 100 associations, organizations, and institutes from each of Japan, South Korea, Germany, and the United States could be surveyed. The survey items can be divided into four main sections : Section 1 concerning information exchange relationship (network) and resource exchange relationship (network) among … More target organizations ; Section 2 concerning the main events in environmental policy from the 1980s until the time of conducting the survey (between the and of 1997 and 2000) and the position of the target organization in regards to these issues ; Section 3 concerning information about the internal structure of the target organizations ; and Section 4, concerning a survey of the network relationships among international organizations. Through this survey and analysis, mainly aimed at all actor groups, the study inquires as to how each country's global environmental policy is formed by identifying the domestic and international information and resource exchange processes. Each actor group can be distinguished in terms of whether there is policy recognition incorporating all features and can be located in terms of comparative politics. Through this analysis, the differences in global environmental policy for each country as well as each international organization can be structurally explained or the significance of structural factors can be specified. This research is a full-scale "comparative" and "network analysis" approach to "global environmental policy," and in regards to these three points, is a particularly valuable empirical analysis. Not only does this investigation identify structural differences among each country in this field, but even from the standpoint of political science, it is an ambitious study that reveals the structural interpenetration of international and domestic politics encompassing NGOs to international organizations within large-scale global network structures. Related case studies were also included in the report concerning this research. Less