STUDY OF LEXICAL SEMANTICS BASED ON X'-SEMANTICS

基于X-语义的词汇语义研究

基本信息

批准号：
10610453
负责人：
NAKAMURA Masaru
金额：
$ 1.47万
依托单位：
TOHOKU UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
1998
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
1998 至 2000
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

1. I argue about the problem concerning the correlation between meanings of verbs and their complement sentence selection, that is, whether we can predict, on the basis of the substantive semantics of verbs, what type of complement sentence they can select, and find out the close correlation between the semantics of complement sentence-taking verbs and the types of complement sentences. I also provide a semantic account of the differences and similarities of factive and semi-factive predicates.2. Some verbs taking complement sentences require their complement sentence to be of the form V-NP-to-VP.They can be classified into three types, want-type verbs, persuade-type verbs, and believe-type verbs, in terms of certain criteria. However, if these criteria are applied to verbs like allow, permit, force, order, etc., conflicting results are obtained. However, these problems are solved if these verbs are classified as ECM type verbs like believe and a certain rule of inference.3. Minimalist grammars, unlike GB grammars, are so constructed as to generate only grammatical sentences. This idea gives birth to the strong thesis that the computational component makes no errors in every step of derivation. To implement this thesis the Earliness Principle is proposed that claims that licensing should be done as early as possible. Since the strong thesis allows no misapplication of movements, traditional conditions on movements like the Subjacency Condition and CED should be eliminated from the computational component. Ungrammatical sentences that are claimed to have been ruled out by these island conditions are just underivable sentences. And island effects, if any, should be accounted for by perceptual strategies, pragmatic principles, or semantic or phonological principles.

1。我争论有关动词含义与其补体句子选择之间的相关性的问题，也就是说，我们是否可以根据动词的实质性语义，可以选择哪种类型的补体句子，并找出补充句子的语义语义 - 互补动词的语义和补体句子的类型之间的紧密相关性。我还提供了语义描述，介绍了事实和半事实谓词的差异和相似性。2。一些动词采用补语句子要求其补充句子为V-np-to-vp的形式。它们可以根据某些条件将其分为三种类型，want-type type动词，说服型动词和相信型动词。但是，如果将这些标准应用于允许，允许，武力，命令等等动词，则将获得相互矛盾的结果。但是，如果这些动词被归类为ECM类型动词，例如相信和一定的推论规则3。与GB语法不同，简约的语法是如此构造，以至于仅产生语法句子。这个想法诞生了一个有力的论点，即计算组件在派生的每个步骤中都没有错误。为了实施这一论文，提出了初级原则，即应尽早进行许可。由于强有力的论文不允许误解运动，因此应从计算组件中消除诸如次要条件和CED之类的运动的传统条件。声称被这些岛屿条件排除的非语法句子只是不可分割的句子。和岛屿效应（如果有的话）应由知觉策略，务实的原则或语义或语音原理来解释。