Distributive Conflicts and Economic Development in Asian Perspective

亚洲视角下的分配冲突与经济发展

• 批准号: 10630034
• 负责人: TERANISHI Juro
• 金额: $ 1.47万
• 依托单位: Hitotsubashi University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 1998
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1998 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-10630034/
• 关键词: distributive conflicts; state-private sector interface; industry; Brazil; classes; Japan; macroeconomic stability; governance; 審議会; 業界団体; 産業間対立; 遮断仮説; 要素賦存仮説; 縁故主義; 政府民間関係; 階級対立; 農業; レント; 労働組合運動; 集団行動

Distributive conflicts in the private sector do not usually complete themselves within the private sector, but quite often involves government intervention. This study has conducted a historical and comparative investigation about how distributive conflicts in the private sector is aggregated and how the government responded to the distributive conflicts.The state-private sector interface regarding distributive conflicts differs considerably among countries and regions as well as among historical phases of each country. In Japan after WWII, distributive demand by the private sector was represented by the interests of each industry, and the government responded to this by specifying specific bureaus for each industry. In Brazil after WWII, distributive conflicts was represented by the interests of classes or by the ownership of production factors. The government responded this by intervening into minimum wage determination or other measures. In other countries in East Asia, interface similar to Japan has emerged after the 1980s, especially in Thailand. However, in Korea distributive conflicts among classes have been intensified throughout the postwar years.The pattern of state-private sector interface regarding distributive conflicts has significant bearings on the macroeconomic stability as well as on the overall governance of the economy. We have investigated how inflation is related to the interface in the Brazilian case, and how the bubble burst in Japan after 1990 has been related to the pattern of interface in the preceding high-growth-era.

私营部门的分配冲突通常不会在私营部门内部完成，但往往涉及政府干预。本研究对私营部门分配冲突如何聚集以及政府如何应对分配冲突进行了历史和比较调查。国家和地区之间，以及每个国家的不同历史阶段之间，关于分配冲突的国有-私营部门界面存在很大差异。在二战后的日本，私营部门的分配需求以每个行业的利益为代表，政府通过为每个行业指定特定的局来回应这一点。在二战后的巴西，分配冲突以阶级利益或生产要素所有权为代表。对此，政府采取了干预最低工资确定或其他措施。在东亚其他国家，类似于日本的界面在20世纪80年代以后也出现了，尤其是在泰国。然而，在韩国，各阶级之间的分配冲突在战后的岁月里愈演愈烈。关于分配冲突的国有-私营部门界面模式对宏观经济稳定以及经济的整体治理具有重要影响。我们已经研究了巴西的通货膨胀与界面的关系，以及1990年后日本的泡沫破裂与之前高增长时代的界面模式的关系。

项目成果

Juro Teranishi: "Showa Kinyu-kyoukou no Keiken ni Manabu (Lessons from the Showa Financial Crisis in 1927)"Masahiko Aoki and JuroTeranishi eds., Tenkan-ki no Ajia to Nihon Kigyo (East Asia and Japanese Firms in Transition), Toyokeizai-shinposha. 61-77 (20

Juro Teranishi：“Showa Kinyu-kyoukou no Keiken ni Manabu（1927 年昭和金融危机的教训）”Masahiko Aoki 和 Juro Teranishi eds.，Tenkan-ki no Ajia to Nihon Kigyo（东亚和转型中的日本企业），Toyokeizai-

Juro Teranishi: "The Main Bank System"The Japanese Economic System and its Historical Origins. 63-96 (1999)

寺西十郎：《主要银行体系》日本经济体系及其历史渊源。

Juro Teranishi: "Industrial Interests versus Class Interests; Conflicts over Income Distribution in the Economic Development of Japan and Brazil"The Institutional Foundation of East Asian Economic Development. 285-317 (1998)

寺西十郎：“产业利益与阶级利益；日本和巴西经济发展中的收入分配冲突”东亚经济发展的制度基础。

寺西重郎: "東アジアの通貨危機と分配をめぐる対立"市場の役割 国家の役割. 309-326 (1999)

Shigeo Teranishi：“东亚货币危机和分配冲突”国家市场角色的作用 309-326 (1999)。

寺西重郎: "東アジアの金融危機とマクロ経済政策"『ASEAN4の金融と財政の歩み』. 139-155 (1998)

Shigeo Teranishi：“东亚的金融危机和宏观经济政策”《东盟金融与金融史》139-155（1998）。