权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Public Sector Reforms: International Perspective

公共部门改革：国际视角

基本信息

批准号：
12303002
负责人：
MIYAKAWA Tadao
金额：
$ 14.18万
依托单位：
Reitaku University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
财政年份：
2000
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2000 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Public sector reforms in the United States, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia and Japan were theoretically and empirically investigated in terms of governance and management. As a result, the main findings are as follows:1. In general the reforms have firstly started to adopt market typed model seeking 'small government', then moved into adopting a business management model and lastly developed towards a mixed model taking into account of governance and network.2. In other words, first, privatization, contracting out and internal market were introduced into the management system, second, enterprise model focusing on business methods and corporate governance was followed and at present collaborative management in which the related government activities with private sector including NPO are harmonized in order to accomplish the governmental goals.3. In the first stage the content of the reform is organization structure and financial reporting accounting, therefore the key idea is cost. The second stage seeks to adopt the new public management (NPM) in which performance management towards technical efficiency is applied in the public sector. In the third stage, the focus is transformed into budgetary reform and improving the quality of policy that effectiveness and allocation efficiency are much considered.4. Japan is now placed in the second stage. However, since financial management reform is lagged, cash based accounting is still used and program evaluation or performance measurement is not well linked to budgeting. NPM is limited to adopting the principle of result-oriented approach in ex post evaluation: the traditional public administration and NPM that are conflicted each other are mixed in the management system. The inconsistent and selective approach in Japan has resulted in much less fruitful outcomes from the public sector reform.

从治理和管理的角度对美国、联合王国、新西兰、澳大利亚和日本的公共部门改革进行了理论和实证调查。因此，主要研究结果如下：1。总的来说，改革首先开始采用寻求“小政府”的市场模式，然后转向采用商业管理模式，最后发展到考虑治理和网络的混合模式。换句话说，首先，在管理体制中引入私有化、外包和内部市场，其次，遵循以商业方法和公司治理为重点的企业模式，现在是协调政府与包括NPO在内的私营部门的相关活动，以实现政府目标的协同管理。第一阶段改革的内容是组织结构和财务报告会计，因此改革的核心思想是成本。第二阶段寻求采用新的公共管理（NPM），其中对技术效率的绩效管理应用于公共部门。第三阶段，重点转向预算改革和提高政策质量，更加注重实效和配置效率。日本现在处于第二阶段。然而，由于财务管理改革滞后，现金制会计仍在使用，项目评估或绩效衡量与预算编制没有很好地联系起来。NPM仅限于在事后评价中采用结果导向原则，传统公共行政与NPM在管理体系中相互冲突。日本不一致和选择性的做法导致公共部门改革的成果少得多。