Intersection of legal and non-legal norms-in cases of long-term contractual relationships

法律与非法律规范的交叉点——在长期合同关系的情况下

• 批准号: 12620054
• 负责人: YAMAMOTO Kenji
• 金额: $ 2.3万
• 依托单位: Kobe University (2002-2003)Kyushu University (2000-2001)
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
• 财政年份: 2000
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2000 至 2003
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-12620054/
• 关键词: self-determination; contract; commitment; process; relationship; social norm; rule; skill; 契約正義; 支援; パターナリズム; 傾聴; 消費者契約; 関係形成; 交渉; 消費者法; 改訂; 救済法; 継続的契約; 再交渉義務; 契約責任

In this research it is made clear that not only legal norms but also non-legal norms play very important role for conflict resolutions in case of long-term contractual relationships. Traditionally contract theories and contract law dogmatics have been stressing only the importance of legal norms to analyze dispute resolution. But first this research has explicated that parties in contract dispute processes usually use non-legal norms to legitimize their claims and to find convincing resolutions for both parties. Secondly in this research it became clear that focusing only on direct two parties to analyze long-term contract dispute processes is not enough to understand the whole aspects of it. It should be observed that not only the direct two parties but also third parties around the two parties also play critical roles in dispute processes. That means both parties figure their will and make self-determination toward dispute resolutions step-by-step in the process of continuous contact … More with people around them. "Self-determination" is the basic principle in contract law and in theories of dispute resolution. In my view this principle should not be understood as though parties make their determination in vacuums. But they form their will gradually under the contact with others and under the influence of many social norms. It should be said parties formulate their self-determination in self-searching manners. So this research focuses on this process and especially on the relationship of disputing parties to people around them to determine their will in this conflict. Finally this research extracts the importance of the phase of "concrete skills" of parties which cannot be reduce to legal norms. This research has found finally this kind of skills has been developed especially in many fields of practices of "counseling" so that the further analysis for these practices should be made to deepen the knowledge about this skills of "self-searching" or "self-reflection" which will be performed in the process with third parties around disputing parties. Less

在本研究中，它是明确的，不仅法律的规范，而且非法律的规范发挥非常重要的作用，在解决冲突的情况下，长期的合同关系。传统的合同理论和合同法教义学只强调法律的规范对争议解决的重要性。但首先，本研究阐明了合同纠纷过程中的当事人通常使用非法律规范来使他们的主张合法化，并为双方找到令人信服的解决方案。其次，在本研究中，我们发现，仅仅关注直接当事人双方来分析长期合同纠纷过程是不足以理解长期合同纠纷过程的全部方面的，不仅直接当事人双方，而且当事人双方周围的第三方在纠纷过程中也起着至关重要的作用。这意味着双方在不断接触的过程中逐步确定自己的意愿并自主解决争端 ...更多信息 周围的人。意思自治是合同法和纠纷解决理论的基本原则。我认为，这一原则不应被理解为当事方是在真空中作出决定的。但他们的意志是在与他人的接触和诸多社会规范的影响下逐渐形成的。应该说，当事方是以自我探索的方式形成自决的。因此，本研究的重点是这一过程，特别是对关系的争议当事人对他们周围的人，以确定他们的意愿，在这场冲突。最后本研究提炼出当事人“具体技能”阶段的重要性，这一阶段不能归结为法律的规范。本研究最后发现，这种技巧在许多“谘商”的实务领域中已经得到发展，因此，对于这些实务的进一步分析，将有助于加深对于这种“自我检视”或“自我反省”技巧在与争议当事人周围的第三人沟通过程中的认识。少

项目成果

KENJI YAMAMOTO: "EMPOWERMENT NOT AS AID-IN CASES OF PRIVATE LAW THEORIES"POSSIBILITIES OF SOCIOLOGY OF LAW. 48-77 (2004)

山本健二：“在私法理论的情况下，赋权不是辅助”法律社会学的可能性。

山本顯治: "非援助の支援と民事法学-法・コンテクスト・技法-"法律文化社(棚瀬孝雄教授還暦記念論文集所収・近刊). (2004)

Kenji Yamamoto：“非援助支持和民法 - 法律、背景、技术 -”Horitsu Bunkasha（Takao Tanase 教授的 60 周年论文集，即将出版）（2004 年）。

山本顯治: "非援助の支援と民事法学-法・コンテクスト・技法-法社会学の可能性-棚瀬孝雄教授還暦記念論文集-"法律文化社. 600(46-77) (2004)

Kenji Yamamoto：“非援助支持和民法 - 法律、背景和技术 - 法律社会学的可能性 - 田濑隆夫教授 60 周年纪念论文集”Horitsu Bunkasha（2004 年）。