权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

A Comparative and historical study on democratization in East and Southeast Asia

东亚和东南亚民主化的比较和历史研究

基本信息

批准号：
13620089
负责人：
TAMADA Yoshifumi
金额：
$ 2.24万
依托单位：
KYOTO UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2001
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2001 至 2002
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This is a study on democratization in East and Southeast Asian regions. There are many countries which, in the last two decades, have succeeded in democratization, South Korea and Taiwan in East Asia, and the Philippines, Indonesia, East Timor, Thailand and Cambodia in Southeast Asia. Most of these new democracies are struggling to achieve consolidation. However, both regions are characterized by a great diversity of political regimes. There remain four Leninist regimes, a military government, an autocratic regime and two democracies that are often regarded as "soft authoritarian."We selected five democracies from the regions, Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia. Five specialists on politics of respective country studied democratic transition (and consolidation) in each country. With the help of two scholars specializing on political theory, we have tried to think about democratization from a comparative and historical perspective.In addition to details of each country, four general points are confirmed. First, causes of starting democratization are diff*** from country to country. Second, consolidation of democratic regimes is far difficult than collapse of non-democratic reg***. Third, as democratization needs at least a few decades, we must think it from a historical perspective. Fourth, the r*** political elite is crucial in democratizing process

这是一项关于东亚和东南亚地区民主化的研究。在过去20年中，有许多国家成功地实现了民主化，东亚的韩国和台湾，以及东南亚的菲律宾、印度尼西亚、东帝汶、泰国和柬埔寨。大多数新民主国家都在努力实现巩固。然而，这两个区域的特点是政治制度的巨大差异。目前仍有四个列宁主义政权，一个军政府，一个专制政权和两个民主国家，通常被视为“软专制”。“我们从该地区挑选了五个民主国家，即韩国、菲律宾、印度尼西亚、泰国和柬埔寨。各国的五名政治专家研究了每个国家的民主过渡（和巩固）。在两位政治理论专家的帮助下，我们试图从比较和历史的角度来思考民主化，除了每个国家的细节之外，还确定了四个一般性观点。首先，各国启动民主化的原因各不相同。第二，民主政权的巩固远比非民主政权的崩溃困难。第三，民主化至少需要几十年的时间，我们必须从历史的角度来思考。第四，政治精英在民主化进程中起着关键作用