Comparative Research on Kaempter

坎普特的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510581
负责人：
NAKA Naoichi
金额：
$ 1.09万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14510581/
关键词：
Kaempfer Geschichte und Be-schreibung von Japan old edition Dohm Heutiges Japan new edition rewriting comparison 新編集版比較対照編集ショイヒツァー日本論江戸時代

项目摘要

In my research I aimed to compare the new edition of Kaempfer's "Heutiges Japan" in the "Complete Works of Kaempfer" with its old edition "Geschichte und Beschreibung von Japan". My intention was to research whether the traditional image over Kaempfer is now to be renewed or not. Concletely my aims were: (1) To make a datebase of the comparison of the old and new edition, (2) To list the important points of the result of comparison, (3) To criticize the conventional Japanese translations, and (4) To consider the possibility of the new Japanese translation.As the result of the research I found following tow problems. (A) Not all the manuscripts which are to be found in the British Library are written by Kaempfer himself. Another men were concerned in the making of manuscripts. (B) The rewriting of Dohm was not partial but total. So it is not easy to say where are the rewritten parts of Dohm and where are the original parts of Kaempfer.So I devided the "Heutiges Japan" into tow parts: parts which were written by Kaempfer aud parts which are written by another men. And part to part I compared "Heutiges Japan" with "Geschichte und Beschreibung von Japan". The results are: (I) In the edition of Dohm's "Geschichte und Beschreibung von Japan" there are many parts, which are rewritten by Dohm with his value judgment. But there are also parts, which are not rewritten by Dohm. (II) It is true that the edition of Dohm has problems. But they are not too profound to renew the traditional image over Kaempfer.

在我的研究中，我的目的是将Kaempfer的新版本的“ Heutiges Japan”与“ Kaempfer的完整作品”有关，其旧版本的“ Geschichte und und Beschreibung von Japan”。我的目的是研究Kaempfer的传统形象现在是否要续签。简而言之，我的目标是：（1）将旧版本和新版本的比较日期库，（2）列出比较结果的重要点，（3）批评传统的日语翻译，以及（4）考虑新日语翻译的可能性。因为我发现了以下拖车问题的研究结果。（a）并非所有在大英图书馆中找到的手稿都是由Kaempfer本人撰写的。另一个人关心制作手稿。（b）DOHM的重写不是部分，而是总数。因此，说dohm的重写部分以及Kaempfer的原始部分在哪里并不容易。因此，我将“ Heutiges Japan”置于拖曳部分：由Kaempfer Aud Parts撰写的部分，由其他男人写。以及第一部分的一部分，将“日本heutiges”与“ Geschichte und Beschreibung von Japan”进行了比较。结果是：（i）在Dohm的“ Geschichte and Beschreibung von Japan”的版本中，有很多部分，由Dohm重写他的价值判断。但是还有一些部分，这些部分未由DOHM重写。（ii）DOHM的版本确实存在问题。但是，它们并不是太深刻了，无法将传统形象更新超越Kaempfer。