权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

From Quasi-juridical Ethics to Process-Ethics : Challenge to transform of 'bioethics' into Clinical Philosophy

从准司法伦理到过程伦理：“生命伦理”向临床哲学转变的挑战

基本信息

批准号：
15320003
负责人：
KIHIRA Tomoki
金额：
$ 9.09万
依托单位：
Osaka University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

In this research project, we tried to transform Bioethics into process-ethics, that we think as a alternative to quasi-juridical ethics. In order to search a possibility of this transformation, we researched as follow :To clarify the Problematic of quasi-juridical Ethics, which we call, we invited researcher of Bioethics and held several symposiums. We invited Professor Kanamori Osamu(Tokyo Uni.) to lecture about liberal new eugenics. Dietmer Mieth(from Germany) talked about policy of bioethics and genetic engineering in EU. Michaela Serbulea(from romania) talked about the relation between cultural background and bioethics. Trough these symposiums, we elucidated that the nature of the problematic of quasi-juridical ethics lie in a court model, which ignore the process to reach a decision.To overcome this problematic, we explored the possibilities of alternative ethics, which focuses on the process to come to a decision. And we conducted following researches.We joined forces to hold philosophical cafe in the Hiroshima meeting of Japan research group of home care hospice. In this cafe participants talked about care under the following theme: Is there a care, which does not invade patient's privacy?Nakaoka took part in the symposium about the education of philosophy in the meeting of the Philosophical Association of Japan as a panelist. From 2003 to this year, we had ten classes of Philosophy per a year in the high school in Kyoto and taught philosophical thinking and trained dialog between students. Through these activities, we assessed social roll of philosophy and sought possibilities of cooperative decision-making.We investigated Narrative based Medicine (EBM), which gets a lot of attention to compensate Evidence based Medicine (EBM). And we held public symposium about the relation between Spirituality and Narrative.We sum up these researches and made a report.

在这个研究项目中，我们试图将生命伦理学转化为过程伦理学，我们认为这是准法律伦理学的替代品。为了寻求这种转变的可能性，我们进行了如下研究：为了澄清我们称之为准法律伦理学的问题，我们邀请了生命伦理学的研究者，并举行了几次研讨会。我们邀请了Kanamori Osamu教授（东京大学）。去演讲自由主义的新优生学Dietmer Mieth（来自德国）谈了欧盟的生物伦理和基因工程政策。来自罗马尼亚的Michaela Serbulea谈到了文化背景与生命伦理学的关系。通过这些研讨会，我们阐明了准司法伦理问题的本质在于法院模式，这种模式忽视了达成裁决的过程，为了克服这一问题，我们探索了替代伦理的可能性，这种替代伦理关注的是达成裁决的过程。并进行了以下研究：在日本家庭护理临终关怀研究小组的广岛会议上，我们联合举办了哲学咖啡馆。在这个咖啡馆里，参与者在以下主题下谈论护理：有没有一种护理，它不会侵犯病人的隐私？中冈作为顾问参加了日本哲学协会的哲学教育研讨会。从2003年到今年，我们在京都的高中每年有十节哲学课，教授哲学思维，培养学生之间的对话。通过这些活动，我们评估了哲学的社会角色，并寻求合作决策的可能性。我们调查了叙事医学（EBM），这是一个很受关注的补充循证医学（EBM）。并就精神性与叙事的关系举行了公开研讨会，对这些研究进行了总结并作了报告。