权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Publicness in the East Asia for the 21st century : The Transformation of the Public Power by Market and Information Technology, and its Legal Reconstruction.

21世纪东亚的公共性：市场和信息技术对公共权力的改造及其法制重建。

基本信息

批准号：
15330007
负责人：
KAMINO Kenji
金额：
$ 6.34万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2005
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This research sets out to show a comparative legal study on the public power in the East Asia. The purpose of this study is to make clear that administrative law studies in the East Asia are commonly required to reconstruct their own administrative law theory and practice regarding the public power that has been changed by a variety of Globalization. For the purpose we deal here with problems of the public power on the organizational, substantive, procedural and remedial level and try to answer the question that how do scholars in the area apply the informational technology and market, force to their own problems. Part I in this report is to investigate why recent legal reforms concerning remedial law system have common problems in the East Asia. Central to this issue is the problem of dominant factors in this legal phenomenon. In Part II we examine the meaning of informational technology and its limitation from the standpoint of public law theory. In Part III problems of publicness are discussed on the grand theoretical side. Further interviews with officers are contained in Part IV.In concluding, we point out that the framework with which we can realize political accountability under real conditions has been normatively needed in these societies. From this point we might go on to an even more detailed examination of the East Asian administrative law problems.

本文旨在对东亚地区的公共权力进行比较法律的研究。本研究的目的在于说明，面对全球化所带来的种种变化，东亚行政法学界普遍需要重构自己的行政法学理论与实践。本文从组织层面、实体层面、程序层面和救济层面对公共权力的问题进行了探讨，试图回答学者们如何运用信息技术和市场力量解决自身问题的问题。本报告的第一部分是探讨为什么近年来有关救济法律制度的法律的改革在东亚地区具有共同的问题。这一问题的核心是这一法律的现象中的主导因素问题。第二部分从公法理论的角度考察了信息技术的含义及其局限性。第三部分从宏观理论的角度讨论了公共性问题。最后，我们指出，在这些社会中，我们可以在真实的条件下实现政治问责的框架是规范性的。从这一点出发，我们可以对东亚的行政法问题进行更详细的考察。