Research of the Media Texts and Discourses of the Minamata Disease Incident Report.

因为水俣病是由智索造成的，直到1968年被政府批准，在《水俣病事件报告》中，形成了压抑地代表水俣病患者及其家庭的话语。就在“智索水俣工厂”的损害责任没有明确的情况下，试图以很少的金钱赔偿受害者及其家属的“抚慰金合同”（MIMAIKIN-KEIYAKU）于1959年12月签订。从此，在媒体环境中形成了以患者及其家属作为存在而接受金钱补偿的话语，以及讲述水俣病事件结束的叙事。结果，水俣病事件并没有作为一个媒体环境下的事件发生。对于1956年以来的《经济白皮书》来说，经济发展确立了日本的独立和国际地位的经济民族主义话语……更重要的是，在《水俣病事件报告》中形成的话语也表现出类似的意识形态特征。而且，在这样一个报道的话语中，一个战后日本经济高增长的意识形态特征确实以经济发展来解决各种矛盾显现出来。1962年发生在CHISSO水俣工厂的劳资纠纷，也被认为是追求经济发展的经济政策矛盾浮出水面的事件。然而，1963年，一篇报道类似争议的话语成为了独家新闻，揭露了一种水俣病的病因材料被包括在CHISSO水俣工厂的排水系统中，并且是潜伏的。换句话说，一篇关于劳资纠纷作为矛盾导致经济发展的报道，阻碍了对当时支撑经济发展的强大企业之一智索的损害责任进行调查的话语的形成。少

For that Minamata disease was caused by CHISSO, until it was authorized by a government in 1968, at Minamata disease incident report, the discourses that repressively represented the sufferers of Minamata disease and their families were formed. Just as a harm responsibility of CHISSO Minamata Factory wasn't made clear, MIMAIKIN-KEIYAKU (a consolatory money contract) that tried to settle compensation to the sufferers and their families with monetary payment only to be scant, was concluded in December in 1959. Since that, the discourses to talk of the sufferers and their families as existences to receive monetary payment, and the narrative to tell that Minamata disease incident came to an end were formed in media environment.The result, Minamata disease incident didn't occur now, as an event at a media environment.For Economic White Book since 1956, a discourse of economic nationalism that Japanese independence and an international position are established by economic development was for … More med, the discourse that was formed in Minamata disease incident report also showed a similar ideological characteristic. And furthermore, in a discourse of such a report, a characteristic of ideology of ar after the war Japanese high economic growth that economic development indeed settles various contradiction by that appears.The labor dispute that occurred in CHISSO Minamata Factory in 1962 also in large way was reported as considering that it is an affair that contradiction of an economic policy to persue economic development came to the surface. However, a discourse to report a dispute like this made the scoop in 1963, to disclose that a cause material of Minamata disease was included in drainage of CHISSO Minamata Factory, latent. In other words, a report to be concerning a labor dispute as a contradiction caused economic development obstructed a formation of a discourse that investigated a harm responsibility of CHISSO that was one of a powerful enterprise that supported economic development in those days. Less