The Evidence-Based Approach in Library and Information Science

图书情报学的循证方法

• 批准号: 18300081
• 负责人: UEDA Shuichi
• 金额: $ 9.61万
• 依托单位: Keio University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2006 至 2007
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-18300081/
• 关键词: Library and Information Science; evidence; research method; EBLIP; EBM; Evidence-Based Practice; eye tracking; 図書館情報学; EBL学; 研究方法

1 Objectives ; The objectives of this research are to reexamine the Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP) and to clarify "Evidence" concepts in the library and information research. In the library and information science, there is the problem of the evidence for the research method as well as other research fields. it is a problem of the evidence in the research method as well as other fields. There are some unique methodology in the library and information science ; user study, bibliographic control, bibliometrics, and information retrieval. It is usual that any research field takes various methodology from some related research area. In the library and information science, the methodology has been introduced from social sciences, humanities, natural sciences and so, common understanding of "evidence" in the research has not established.2 Research Results; To review the research method in the library and information science from the viewpoint of the evidence, the following research projects were done; (1) reexamination of the Evidence Based Librarianship (EBL) concept based on the content analysis of the research articles of EBL or EBLIP, (2) workshops that discuss the evidence obtained from research methods used by the library and information science, (3) investigation the research evidences obtained from the experiments on "information seeking behavior" using eye camera, (4) design the bibliographic database for the literature search in the EBLIP or EBL.

1个目标；这项研究的目的是重新审查基于证据的图书馆和信息实践（EBLIP），并澄清图书馆和信息研究中的“证据”概念。在图书馆和信息科学中，研究方法以及其他研究领域存在证据的问题。这是研究方法和其他领域中证据的问题。图书馆和信息科学中有一些独特的方法论；用户研究，书目控制，书目计量学和信息检索。通常，任何研究领域都从某些相关研究领域采用各种方法。在图书馆和信息科学中，该方法是从社会科学，人文科学，自然科学等中引入的，因此，研究中对“证据”的共同理解尚未确定。2研究结果；从证据的角度来审查图书馆和信息科学中的研究方法，完成了以下研究项目； (1) reexamination of the Evidence Based Librarianship (EBL) concept based on the content analysis of the research articles of EBL or EBLIP, (2) workshops that discuss the evidence obtained from research methods used by the library and information science, (3) investigation the research evidences obtained from the experiments on "information seeking behavior" using eye camera, (4) design the bibliographic database for the literature search in the EBLIP or EBL.

项目成果

Is "Igaku Toshokan" providing the evidence to help medical librarians with decision-making? International Conference, 2007

“医学图书馆”是否提供了帮助医学图书馆员决策的证据？

• 作者: SAKAI;Y;et. al.
• 通讯作者: et. al.

大阪府立中之島図書館の利用に関する調査の分析

大阪府立中之岛图书馆利用调查分析

• 发表时间: 2007
• 期刊: 情報学 4
• 作者: 北 克一;他
• 通讯作者: 他

Is "Igaku Toshokan" providing the evidence to help medical librarians with decision-makina

“医学图书馆”是否提供了帮助医学图书馆员决策的证据

• 发表时间: 2007
• 作者: Sakai;Y ; Kiyama;Y
• 通讯作者: Y

「エビデンス・ベースト・ライブラリアンシップ」(EBL)の枠組みの検討

审视“循证图书馆学”（EBL）的框架

• 发表时间: 2008
• 期刊: Library and Information Science NO.59(印刷中)
• 作者: 上田 修一;他
• 通讯作者: 他

エビデンスベーストライブラリアンシップの再検討

重新考虑循证图书馆管理

• 发表时间: 2006
• 期刊: 第54回日本図書館情報学会研究大会発表要綱
• 作者: 三根慎二;國本千裕;汐崎順子;宮田洋輔;林佐和子;石田栄美;倉田敬子;上田修一
• 通讯作者: 上田修一