PEER ASSESSMENT OF PERSONALITY TRAITS AND PATHOLOGY

人格特质和病理学的同伴评估

• 批准号: 2675134
• 负责人: Thomas Oltmanns
• 金额: $ 18.35万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 1996
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1996-09-30 至 2001-04-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/2675134
• 关键词: adolescence (12-20); behavior prediction; behavioral /social science research tag; clinical research; data collection methodology /evaluation; human subject; interview; mental disorder diagnosis; military personnel; peer group; personality disorders; personality tests; self concept; university student; young adult human (21-34)

DESCRIPTION (Applicant's abstract): Assessment procedures for the personality disorders (PDs) typically focus on self-report measures, even though some people with PDs may be unable to view themselves realistically or unwilling to report socially undesirable traits. Close associates may provide important information regarding the presence of PD traits. Peer nomination is reliable and valid assessment procedure that can be adapted to the study of PDs for research purposes. The proposed study will focus on characteristic features which define ten DSM-IV personality disorders using information collected from both self and others in non-clinical samples of adult men and women. The study is designed to accomplish three major goals: 1) to identify specific areas of agreement and discrepancy between self-report and peer assessment in the measurement of characteristic features of these disorders, 2) to compare the ability of the self- and other-reports to predict the presence of PDs (as determined by structured clinical interviews conducted with a subset of the subjects), and 3) to construct new self-report scales that are better able to predict peer assessments of pathological traits. We will screen an initial sample of 3,000 subjects (1,500 US Air Force recruits and 1,500 university students; half of each group male). In the first assessment phase, each subject will complete a 100-item peer nomination inventory (PNI) describing members of their group, and the Schedule of Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1990). The second assessment phase will involve diagnostic interviews with 15% of these subjects (150 who were rated highest by their peers on the PNI, 150 who were rated highest by themselves of the SNAP, and 150 selected at random). Interviews will be conducted following the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP) by trained clinicians who are blind to all information from the pre-screening procedure.

描述（申请人的摘要）：评估程序 人格障碍（PD）通常侧重于自我报告措施，甚至 尽管有些患有人格障碍的人可能无法现实地看待自己 或不愿意报告社会不良特征。 关系密切的同事可能会 提供有关 PD 特征存在的重要信息。 同行 提名是可靠有效的评估程序，可适用于 出于研究目的对 PD 进行研究。 拟议的研究将重点关注 使用 DSM-IV 定义十种人格障碍的特征 在非临床样本中从自己和他人收集的信息 成年男性和女性。 该研究旨在实现三个主要目标： 1）确定双方之间一致和差异的具体领域 特征测量中的自我报告和同行评估 这些疾病的特征，2）比较自我和 其他报告来预测 PD 的存在（由结构化确定） 对一部分受试者进行临床访谈），以及 3） 构建新的自我报告量表，能够更好地预测同伴 病理特征的评估。 我们将筛选初始样本 3,000 个科目（1,500 名美国空军新兵和 1,500 名大学生； 每组一半为男性）。 在第一评估阶段，每个科目将 完成 100 项同行提名清单 (PNI)，描述以下成员 他们的小组，以及非适应性和适应性人格表（SNAP； 克拉克，1990）。 第二评估阶段将涉及诊断 对其中 15% 的受试者进行访谈（150 名被他们的评价最高的人） PNI 上的同行，150 名被自己评为 SNAP 最高的人，以及 随机选择 150 个）。 面试将在以下时间进行 由训练有素的临床医生进行 DSM-IV 人格 (SIDP) 结构化访谈 对预筛选程序中的所有信息视而不见。