权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences: a review

社会科学中社区的概念和意义：综述

基本信息

批准号：
AH/J500050/1
负责人：
V Walkerdine
金额：
$ 4.1万
依托单位：
CARDIFF UNIVERSITY
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2011
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2011 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FJ500050%2F1
关键词：
Concepts meanings community social sciences

项目摘要

The project 'Concepts and meanings of community in the social sciences' undertook to produce a conceptual review, linking theoretical underpinnings with the usage of the concepts of community in empirical research and describing the manner in which these conceptualisations appear in government and non-government sector policies and practices. The review mapped key academic texts across 9 disciplines and fields since the 1960s. It reviewed the ways in which key conceptualizations appeared in empirical articles within these fields and disciplines and also appeared within government, NGO and voluntary sector websites, where community was an explicit aspect of the organisation's brief. The review showed that while there is a sophisticated history of debate and investigation within a few key disciplines, there has been a paucity of concepts used within empirical research, applied fields and policy websites. The impact of this is to make community into a 'spray-on term', in which there is little reference to concepts but in which implicit meanings emphasize the significance of community as an object and downplay the importance of social relations and experience. The implications of this for research, policy and practice are profound: we badly need research which allows community as action to be conceptualized in ways which understand and thus support action by community members, central to the localism agenda.

“社会科学中社区的概念和意义”项目着手进行概念审查，将理论基础与社区概念在实证研究中的使用联系起来，并说明这些概念化在政府和非政府部门政策和做法中的出现方式。该审查映射了自20世纪60年代以来9个学科和领域的关键学术文本。它审查了关键概念化出现在这些领域和学科的经验性文章中的方式，以及出现在政府、非政府组织和志愿部门网站上的方式，在这些网站上，社区是本组织简介的一个明确方面。审查表明，虽然在一些关键学科中有着复杂的辩论和调查历史，但在实证研究、应用领域和政策网站中使用的概念却很少。其影响是使社区成为一个“喷雾术语”，其中很少提到概念，但其中隐含的意义强调社区作为对象的重要性，并淡化社会关系和经验的重要性。这对研究，政策和实践的影响是深远的：我们迫切需要的研究，使社区作为行动的概念化的方式理解，从而支持社区成员的行动，中央的地方主义议程。