权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Creating Space: A re-evaluation of the role of culture in regeneration

创造空间：重新评估文化在再生中的作用

基本信息

批准号：
AH/L01436X/1
负责人：
Kate Oakley
金额：
$ 0.95万
依托单位：
University of Leeds
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2014 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FL01436X%2F1
关键词：
Creating Space re evaluation role

项目摘要

This application proposes to conduct a critical review of the literature of the role of art and culture in the regeneration of urban places and communities. It will focus primarily on the academic literature, but, given the nature of the field, will also review relevant policy literature. Its starting point is that much of the academic literature argues that culturally-led regeneration efforts have often failed, at least in terms of delivering the widespread social benefits that many have promised. Too often these developments have led to rising land values, rising rents and the eventual eviction of low income households, artists and even small cultural businesses. The conflicts produced by these sort of gentrification processes is well covered in existing literature.Given this, this critcal review proposes three areas for research that will take this debate in new and hopefully, fruitful directions: 1. To reconsider the idea of 'urban' in the cultural regeneration literature. Although the focus of much of the literature is on larger, urban centres; an emerging literature suggests a different, and perhaps more sustainable set of outcomes outside of these sites. What can we learn from literature on the role of culture suburbs, rural areas and small towns? What are the implications for larger cultural institutions often associated with metropolises? What cultural forms eg. craft or festivals are linked to regeneration in smaller towns and cities? What scale is most appropriate for cultural regeneration?2. To present a global survey of the literature, which specifically seeks out work not limited to the UK and North American experience. What are the different models of urban regeneration arising in different global contexts? What are the links between urban regeneration and development in the Global South? Are there particular regional approaches eg. Latin America, that could form a distinctive approach to regeneration?3. To consider the 'new politics of place' and its links to culture and urban regeneration. Movements such as Occupy have re-focussed attention on the importance of public space, community and conviviality, an element of cultural regeneration that has often been over-looked in the focus on new, built infrastructure. What, if anything, is the specific role for artists in this new politics? Beyond the 'flagship' building; what sort of cultural infrastructure really matters? What are the links between cultural and social movements in the new politics of place?

本申请旨在对艺术和文化在城市场所和社区再生中的作用的文献进行批判性审查。它将主要关注学术文献，但考虑到该领域的性质，也会审查相关的政策文献。其出发点是，许多学术文献认为，以文化为主导的复兴努力常常失败，至少在提供许多人承诺的广泛社会福利方面是如此。这些发展常常导致土地价值上涨、租金上涨，并最终导致低收入家庭、艺术家甚至小型文化企业被驱逐。现有文献充分涵盖了此类中产阶级化进程所产生的冲突。鉴于此，这篇批判性评论提出了三个研究领域，这些领域将使这场辩论朝着新的、有望取得成果的方向发展： 1. 重新考虑文化再生文献中的“城市”概念。尽管许多文献的重点都集中在较大的城市中心；一项新兴文献提出了在这些地点之外的一系列不同的、也许更可持续的结果。我们可以从有关文化郊区、农村地区和小镇作用的文献中学到什么？这对通常与大都市相关的大型文化机构有何影响？什么文化形式例如。手工艺或节日与小城镇的复兴有关吗？什么规模最适合文化再生？2．提出一项全球文献调查，专门寻找不限于英国和北美经验的工作。在不同的全球背景下出现了哪些不同的城市复兴模式？南方国家的城市复兴与发展之间有何联系？是否有特定的区域方法，例如。拉丁美洲，这可以形成一种独特的再生方法吗？3。考虑“新地方政治”及其与文化和城市复兴的联系。 “占领”等运动重新将注意力集中在公共空间、社区和欢乐的重要性上，这是文化复兴的一个要素，但在关注新建基础设施时常常被忽视。如果有的话，艺术家在这种新政治中的具体角色是什么？超越“旗舰”建筑；什么样的文化基础设施真正重要？新地方政治中的文化运动和社会运动之间有何联系？