权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

'Troubled Families' and Inter-agency Collaboration: Lessons from Historical Comparative Analysis.

“问题家庭”和机构间合作：历史比较分析的教训。

基本信息

批准号：
ES/L01453X/1
负责人：
Val Gillies
金额：
$ 19.29万
依托单位：
Goldsmiths University of London
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2014 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FL01453X%2F1
关键词：
Troubled Families Inter agency Collaboration

项目摘要

Many of the challenges associated with implementing the Government's current 'troubled families' programme have their precedent in the past. Conceptualisations of the issues framing family deprivation and need have followed a cyclical pattern, and greater inter-agency collaboration in the field of children and family services has regularly been proposed across the centuries. Yet policy initiatives tend to be characterised by 'historical amnesia'. The '"Troubled families" and inter-agency collaboration: lessons from historical comparative analysis' project is a creative demonstration of the value of secondary analysis of historically situated material for high impact contemporary voluntary agency strategy lessons. It is founded on a close partnership between the academic researchers and the Family Action voluntary agency, which has been a leading provider of services to disadvantaged families since its foundation as the Charity Organisation Society in 1869.The study applies an historical comparative lens to explore how, over time, the problems faced and engendered by the poorest in society have been variously interpreted and addressed through collaborative agency working in times of economic constraint. It draws on a unique and under-exploited data set: archived Family Action case work papers stretching back to the late 19th century. Up to five cases for in-depth analysis will be drawn from four key historical periods, to capture the challenges faced by families themselves and family support agencies during times of economic hardship: The Long Depression (1873-1896), The Great Depression (1930-1934), The Oil Crisis (1973-1975) and The Global Crisis (2008-2012). Family cases will be selected on the basis of being: London-based; families with dependent children facing problems of poverty, ill health and poor housing; and involving at least three agencies.The study will provide critical reflections on changes and continuities in (a) inter-agency collaboration to support families during and across four major period of economic recession and shifting scenarios of state-third sector relations, and (b) constructions of families as socially problematic and marginalised, of their needs and solutions to them. Findings from the research will feed into Family Action's strategies to enhance collaboration with other agencies, strengthen its sense of its historical identity and longer term outcomes and impact, and attract new funders for the social benefit of its users. The researchers will work in partnerships with Family Action to disseminate lessons about inter-agency collaboration to support 'troubled families' in times of economic austerity in the children, families and poverty field. In addition the research will make a contribution to the development of methodological practice for historical comparative work and knowledge about inter-agency collaboration in the sociological and social policy fields.

与执行政府目前的“问题家庭”方案有关的许多挑战在过去都有先例。对构成家庭贫困和需要的问题的概念化遵循一种循环模式，几个世纪以来，经常有人提议在儿童和家庭服务领域加强机构间合作。然而，政策举措往往具有“历史健忘症”的特点。“问题家庭”和机构间合作：从历史比较分析中吸取的教训“项目创造性地展示了对历史上的材料进行二次分析的价值，以获取影响力大的当代志愿机构战略教训。它是建立在学术研究人员和家庭行动志愿机构之间的密切伙伴关系之上的，该机构自1869年成立以来一直是为弱势家庭提供服务的主要机构。在经济困难时期，通过合作机构的工作，对社会中最贫穷者面临和产生的问题有不同的解释和解决办法。它利用了一个独特的和未充分利用的数据集：归档的家庭行动案件工作文件，可追溯到19世纪世纪后期。将从四个关键的历史时期抽取多达五个案例进行深入分析，以捕捉家庭本身和家庭支助机构在经济困难时期所面临的挑战：长期萧条（1873-1896），大萧条（1930-1934），石油危机（1973-1975）和全球危机（2008-2012）。将根据以下情况选择家庭案例：居住在伦敦;有受抚养子女的家庭面临贫困、健康不佳和住房条件差的问题;这项研究将对以下方面的变化和连续性进行批判性思考：（a）在四个主要经济衰退时期和国家与第三部门关系不断变化的情况下，和（B）将家庭视为社会问题和边缘化家庭，以及家庭的需要和解决办法。研究结果将纳入家庭行动的战略，以加强与其他机构的合作，加强其历史身份感和长期成果和影响，并吸引新的资助者为其用户的社会利益服务。研究人员将与家庭行动合作，传播机构间合作的经验教训，以在儿童、家庭和贫困领域的经济紧缩时期支持“问题家庭”。此外，这项研究将有助于发展历史比较工作的方法实践和社会学和社会政策领域机构间协作的知识。