Linking National and Regional Income Inequality: Cross-Country Data Harmonization and Analysis
Linking National and Regional Income Inequality: Cross-Country Data Harmonization and Analysis
批准号:
ES/V013548/1
负责人:
Neil Lee
金额:
$58.42万
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Research Grant
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021 至 --
中文摘要
我们的研究重点是各国城镇的收入不平等,以及在五个高收入国家,这种不平等是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。近年来,学术研究突出了收入不平等的加剧,特别是收入最高的1%的份额的增加,以及与之相关的社会、经济和政治问题。越来越明显的是,这些国民收入不平等在一定程度上是由国家内部的收入不平等造成的,全球城市(伦敦、巴黎、纽约)和落后的前工业城镇之间存在鸿沟。这一点在“民粹主义”政治的兴起中可见一斑,在这种政治中,生活在经济衰退地区的人们感受到了对复杂社会和经济问题的简单化解决方案的吸引力。各国政府和国际组织越来越意识到与国家经济不平等相关的问题,这得益于现有的研究,这些研究提供了来自不同国家的证据。为了帮助各国政府找到在其城镇、城市和地区更平均地分配繁荣的方法,需要有国际可比的证据,以显示不同国家在地理不平等方面的表现。迄今为止,由于缺乏分解为次国家区域的关于国家不平等的一致和可比较的数据集,阻碍了对基本问题的调查:地方之间和地方内部日益扩大的差距对总体不平等有何影响?是不是因为少数几个“超级明星”城市是推动国家级趋势的主要引擎?国家间不平等的不同演变是从国家以下一级的趋势中出现的吗?不同地区和不同国家的当地生活成本是如何随着时间的推移而变化的?就国家内部的收入和经济活动而言,主要的地理分界线是什么?我们的研究将考察五个高收入国家--加拿大、法国、德国、英国和美国--自20世纪70年代以来的地理收入不平等趋势。我们汇集了一支具有研究地域不平等经验的国际地理学家和具有衡量国民收入不平等经验的经济学家组成的国际专家团队。我们研究的第一个目标是开发一种方法,以一种可以在国家之间进行比较的方式来分析地理收入不平等。我们将解决三大问题:确定可比较的地理区域,有一致的收入衡量标准,以及根据当地不同的生活成本(如住房成本)调整收入。我们将使用来自国家税务记录、工人收入登记处和家庭调查的数据。使用这种方法,我们的第二个目标是评估地理不平等在推动我们五个研究国家的国民收入不平等方面的重要性。第三,我们将分析国家之间和国家内部的共同趋势和差异,并调查这些趋势的原因。我们的最终目标是将这个项目作为一个全球数据库的基础,该数据库提供关于地区之间不平等的信息。我们的愿景是,这将成为研究人员研究地理收入不平等原因的信息点,并让政府了解他们的国家与其他国家的比较情况。
英文摘要
Our study focuses on income inequality in towns and cities within countries and how this has changed over time in five high-income countries. In recent years, academic research has highlighted the rise of income inequality, particularly the increase of top 1% income share, and the associated social, economic and political problems. It is becoming increasingly clear that these national income inequalities are driven in part by income inequalities within countries, with a divide between the 'superstar' global cities (London, Paris, New York) and 'left behind' ex-industrial towns. This is apparent in the rise of 'populist' politics, in which people living in economically declining places are feeling the pull of simplistic solutions to complex social and economic problems. Governments and international organisations have become increasingly aware of the problems associated with national economic inequality, aided by existing research that provides evidence from different countries. To help governments find ways to spread prosperity more evenly across their towns, cities and regions, there is a need for internationally comparable evidence to show how different countries perform in terms of geographic inequalities. The lack of consistent and comparable datasets on national inequality decomposed into sub-national regions has so far prevented the investigation of fundamental questions: What is the influence of growing disparities across and within local areas on overall inequality? Is it that a few 'superstar' cities are the main engines of country-level trends? Does the divergent evolution of national inequality across countries emerge from trends at the sub-national level? How are local costs of living in different areas evolving over time and across countries? What are the main geographic division lines in terms of income and economic activity within countries? Our study will examine trends in geographic income inequality across five high-income countries - Canada, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States - since the 1970s. We have brought together an international expert team of geographers with experience of studying geographic inequality and economists experienced in measuring national income inequality. The first objective of our research is to develop a method for analysing geographic income inequality in a way that can be compared between countries. We will tackle three big problems: defining comparable geographic areas, having consistent measures of income and adjusting incomes for the varied local cost of living (e.g. housing costs). We will use data from national tax records, from registries of workers' earnings and household surveys. Using this method, our second objective is to assess the importance of geographic inequalities in driving national income inequalities across our five study countries. Third, we will analyse the common trends and differences between and within countries, and investigate the causes of these trends. Our final objective is to use this project as the foundation of a global database that provides information about inequalities between places. Our vision is that this will act as a point of information for researchers to study the causes of geographic income inequality, and for governments to understand how their country compares to others.
期刊论文(3)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Spatial Labour Market Inequality and Social Protection in the UK
英国的劳动力市场空间不平等和社会保护
DOI:
10.31389/lseppr.99
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
LSE Public Policy Review
影响因子:
--
作者:
[Lee N]
通讯作者:
Lee N
DOI:
10.1080/00343404.2022.2159356
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
Regional Studies
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
[Fransham M]
通讯作者:
Fransham M
海外基金