The commercialisation of development funding and changing nature of basic services provision

发展资金的商业化和基本服务提供性质的变化

• 批准号: ES/Y010329/1
• 负责人: Manuel Heckel
• 金额: $ 15.63万
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Fellowship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FY010329%2F1
• 关键词: commercialisation; development; funding; changing; nature

Commercial financing has promised to enable achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. Lately, 'traditional' donors have promoted the approach for sectors such as water and sanitation. Aid has been oriented to mobilise private resources by de-risking investment and creating intermediaries to bring together investors and water utilities.My PhD research looked into these trends in Kenya, investigating the row of donor initiatives that gradually imagined, trialled, and promoted commercial approaches to financing the country's water sector. I theorised this ongoing commercialisation of development funding and associated transformation of the sector as a contested, incomplete, and unstable process where formerly corporatised yet still publicly owned utilities have begun to 'emit debt'. This builds on Social Positioning Theory (Lawson 2019, 2021), an ontological elaboration of the structure(s) of social reality developed by the Cambridge Social Ontology Group, to investigate the changing nature of commercially financed basic services provision. The intensive case study produced a rich empirical account of the historical development of commercialised water sector funding, enabling a structural and causal analysis of the nascent commercially financed water sector, including its emergent tendencies of improved yet more uneven services provision.I plan to publish journal articles that a) elaborate on 'linked positioning', one of my PhD research's key theoretical contributions to Social Positioning Theory, and b) use it to theorise the nature of financialisation as a linked positioning process to help understand it better in Kenya's water sector and beyond.The research left two questions open: how commercialised funding approaches have survived and possibly recovered from Covid-19, which put more stress on basic services provision while significantly reducing collections; and why other forms of commercialised development funding that have promised cheaper funding with more public control (most crucially a 'MajiBank' modelled after the Dutch 'Waterbank') have remained non-starters. I plan to address these two questions through further (limited) research that updates my PhD research for the post-pandemic period and looks more deeply at the historical (non-)development of a 'MajiBank' in Kenya. This includes investigating investors' (next to commercial banks') interest in, and approaches to, investing in Kenya's water sector. Together with my PhD research, this will form the basis of a third journal article that c) unpacks different forms of financialisation and their tendencies to produce different forms of development. Importantly, it will inform development of a book proposal and writings targeted at policy and practitioner circles.I also plan to develop a proposal for future research. To explain the changes in Kenya's water sector, my PhD analysis looked at the 'normative circles' (Elder-Vass 2010, 2012) that have endorsed commercialised forms of funding. I plan to prepare future research on these and donors' efforts to form them and shape their composition, internal division of labour, and orientation to endorse/enforce certain norms of development and its funding. This will help to better understand these circles and their operation, and how the financialisation of development may help donors to maintain some of their slipping power in the wake of growing South-South cooperation and emerging multipolarity, how such power looks like, and how donors have attempted to achieve this.Importantly, I plan to engage in policy debates on basic services development and its funding, and liaise with related organisations (GIZ, KfW, World Bank, WFF, Aqua for All, ...) to disseminate my research findings beyond academia. This includes writing blogs, participating in the World Water Week, and informal knowledge exchange. Furthermore, I plan to use the fellowship and associated mentorship & training for career and personal development

商业融资有望实现联合国可持续发展目标。最近，“传统的”捐助者在水和卫生等部门推广这一方法。援助的方向是通过降低投资风险和创建中介机构来动员私人资源，将投资者和水务公司聚集在一起。我的博士研究调查了肯尼亚的这些趋势，调查了一系列捐助者的倡议，这些倡议逐渐设想、试验和推广了为该国水务部门融资的商业方法。我将这种持续的发展资金商业化和相关的行业转型理论化为一个有争议的，不完整的和不稳定的过程，以前公司化但仍然公有的公用事业已经开始“排放债务”。这建立在社会定位理论（Lawson 2019，2021）的基础上，社会定位理论是剑桥社会本体论小组对社会现实结构的本体论阐述，旨在研究商业融资的基本服务提供的不断变化的性质。密集的案例研究产生了丰富的商业化供水部门融资的历史发展的经验说明，使新生的商业融资供水部门的结构和因果分析，包括其改善但更不均衡的服务提供的新兴趋势。我计划发表期刊文章，a）详细介绍'关联定位'，我的博士研究对社会定位理论的重要理论贡献之一，以及B）使用它来理论化金融化的本质，作为一个关联的定位过程，以帮助更好地理解肯尼亚的水部门和其他部门。该研究留下了两个问题：商业化的融资方式如何从新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情中幸存下来，并可能恢复过来，这给基本服务的提供带来了更大的压力，同时大大减少了收费;以及为什么其他形式的商业化发展融资承诺更便宜的资金和更多的公共控制（最关键的是模仿荷兰“Waterbank”的“MajiBank”）仍然没有启动。我计划通过进一步的（有限的）研究来解决这两个问题，这些研究更新了我在大流行后时期的博士研究，并更深入地研究了肯尼亚“MajiBank”的历史（非）发展。这包括调查投资者（仅次于商业银行）对肯尼亚水部门的投资兴趣和投资方式。与我的博士研究一起，这将构成第三篇期刊文章的基础，c）揭示不同形式的金融化及其产生不同形式发展的趋势。重要的是，它将为针对政策和实践界的书籍提案和著作的发展提供信息。我还计划为未来的研究制定一个提案。为了解释肯尼亚水资源部门的变化，我的博士分析研究了支持商业化资金形式的“规范圈”（Elder-Vass 2010，2012）。我计划今后就这些问题以及捐助者为组建这些机构和确定其组成、内部分工以及核可/执行某些发展规范及其供资的方向所作的努力进行研究。这将有助于更好地了解这些圈子及其运作，以及发展的金融化如何帮助捐助者在南南合作不断发展和多极化出现之后保持其部分下滑的权力，这种权力是什么样子的，以及捐助者如何试图实现这一目标。并与相关组织（德国国际合作机构、德国复兴信贷银行、世界银行、世界森林论坛、人人享有水资源组织.）将我的研究成果传播到学术界之外这包括写博客，参加世界水周和非正式的知识交流。此外，我计划利用奖学金和相关的指导和培训的职业和个人发展