Bohemian Identity Formation, 1620-1740

波西米亚身份的形成，1620-1740 年

• 批准号: 2447427
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2020 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2447427
• 关键词: Bohemian; Identity; Formation; 1620; 1740

My research will focus on the ways in which Bohemian identities were negotiated in the post-White Mountain period. It will consider identity-formation not as an isolated and inward-looking debate, but rather as a question with wider consequences in the religious, political, intellectual, and cultural spheres, and as a question that was discussed across Europe. Much of the previously-existing scholarship on identity in this period bears strong marks of the Communist-era ideology, and there have been very few studies of the authors I will focus on since 1989. Moreover, discussions of early modern Bohemian identity have tended to look primarily at textual sources, despite the fact that architecture, ceremonial, and visual depictions were crucial to such debates. Current scholarship has focused on Bohemian statements of what Bohemian-ness could be; yet the Habsburgs, the pan-Habsburg nobility, and scholars and writers from across the continent were also involved in this identity-formation. My research therefore aims to reconceptualise Bohemian identity as a questionthat wasn't insular and purely Bohemian, but rather as a negotiation that had wider implications for Europe as a whole and that sheds light religious, intellectual, and cultural debates of the period.

我的研究将集中在后白山时代波西米亚身份的谈判方式上。它将把身份形成视为一个孤立的、内向的辩论，而是一个在宗教、政治、知识和文化领域具有更广泛影响的问题，以及一个整个欧洲都在讨论的问题。这一时期以前存在的许多关于身份的学术都带有共产主义时代意识形态的强烈印记，自1989年以来，我将重点关注的作者的研究很少。此外，关于早期现代波西米亚身份的讨论往往主要着眼于文本来源，尽管建筑、仪式和视觉描述对此类辩论至关重要。目前的学术集中在波西米亚人关于波西米亚人可能是什么的陈述上；然而哈布斯堡家族、泛哈布斯堡贵族以及来自整个大陆的学者和作家也参与了这种身份的形成。因此，我的研究旨在将波西米亚人的身份重新定义为一个问题，这个问题不是孤立的、纯粹的波西米亚人，而是一种对整个欧洲具有更广泛影响的谈判，它揭示了那个时期的宗教、智力和文化辩论。