权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

An Integrated Approach to Sustainable Urban Redevelopment: Birmingham Eastside as a National and International Demonstrator

可持续城市重建的综合方法：伯明翰东区作为国家和国际示范者

基本信息

批准号：
EP/E021603/1
负责人：
Christopher David Foss Rogers
金额：
$ 65.35万
依托单位：
University of Birmingham
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Research Grant
财政年份：
2006
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2006 至无数据
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=EP%2FE021603%2F1
关键词：
Integrated Approach Sustainable Urban Redevelopment

项目摘要

The aim of the Sustainable Eastside Project is to explore how sustainability is addressed in the regeneration decision-making process, and to assess the sustainability performance of completed development schemes in Birmingham Eastside against stated sustainability credentials and aspirations. The incorporation of sustainability into an urban regeneration program, such as Birmingham Eastside, appears best conceptualised as a complex decision-making process carried out by stakeholders who are embedded within the development process. The barriers to and enablers of sustainability (as identified in Phase I of this project) appear at various moments or locations within this complex. The timing and context of decisions are critical (examined in Phase II), and can cause path-dependency which then limits how sustainability features in final development plans. In Phases I & II, the research set in place a framework of cross-disciplinary knowledge and key partnerships; highlighted the importance of coherent integration of the three pillars of sustainability to enable the complexity of achieving urban sustainability to be sufficiently grappled with; gained access to key decision-making forums in Eastside; built strong links with key stakeholders in the area; and firmly integrated into the policy agenda for Eastside. In addition, researchers are working to establish a cross-cutting baseline dataset of developments in Eastside rigorously to measure change over time and the impact of particular decisions on the sustainability of the overall urban regeneration programme. In so doing the foundations for a zonal urban regeneration case study site are being established, augmented by the creation of a study facility, with library and hot desking, now available for researchers from SUE / IEP consortia, to study the application of research to practice. The emerging findings of Phase II have allowed researchers to develop a series of hypotheses about the timing of decisions for sustainability in a range of decision-making forums, and the extent to which path-dependency becomes problematic. In Phase III, a suite of innovative analytical tools will be employed to elucidate further the complexities and interactions of the key elements of the sustainability vision for Eastside. First, a Development Timeline Framework (DTF), a multi-disciplinary tool that makes explicit the path dependency of decisions toward achieving sustainability goals, and the conflicts and synergies between different sustainability objectives, will be used as the basis for further research. Second, a cross-cutting Sustainability Checklist (SC) applied to the DTF will allow each researcher to analyse the impact of timing and context of decisions for each sustainability element (e.g. biodiversity, public participation, space utilisation, local sourcing, and recycling). Third, an Industrial Ecology (IE) analysis will follow particular resources (e.g. water, aggregates) thus highlighting their interdependence, while a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) approach will enable assessment of the socio-cultural aspects of sustainability (not covered by the IE approach). This suite of tools underpins the delivery of the work package aims. This analysis will be undertaken on a case history site basis, using development sites within Eastside that are all currently 'live,' each site representing a different conceptualisation of sustainability. This provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the specific impact of early thinking about sustainability in the planning and design stages, and the impact of this timing and path-dependency on sustainability performance in the final built form.

可持续东区项目的目的是探索如何在再生决策过程中解决可持续性问题，并根据声明的可持续性证书和愿望评估伯明翰东区已完成的发展计划的可持续性表现。将可持续发展纳入城市更新计划，如伯明翰东区，似乎最好的概念是由嵌入开发过程中的利益相关者执行的复杂决策过程。可持续性的障碍和推动因素（如项目第一阶段所确定的）出现在这个综合体的不同时刻或位置。决策的时机和背景是至关重要的（在第二阶段进行审查），并可能导致路径依赖，从而限制可持续性在最终发展计划中的特点。在第一阶段和第二阶段，研究建立了跨学科知识和关键伙伴关系的框架；强调将可持续性的三大支柱连贯地结合起来的重要性，以使实现城市可持续性的复杂性得到充分解决；获得了参加东区关键决策论坛的机会；与该地区的主要利益相关者建立牢固的联系；并牢牢地融入了东区的政策议程。此外，研究人员正在努力建立东区发展的交叉基线数据集，以严格衡量随时间的变化以及特定决策对整个城市再生计划可持续性的影响。在这样做的过程中，正在建立一个地带性城市再生案例研究地点的基础，并通过建立一个研究设施来加强，该设施包括图书馆和办公桌，现在可供SUE / IEP联盟的研究人员使用，以研究将研究应用于实践。第二阶段的新发现使研究人员能够在一系列决策论坛中提出一系列关于可持续性决策时机的假设，以及路径依赖成为问题的程度。在第三阶段，将采用一套创新的分析工具来进一步阐明东区可持续发展愿景关键要素的复杂性和相互作用。首先，发展时间表框架（DTF）是一个多学科的工具，它明确了实现可持续发展目标的决策路径依赖性，以及不同可持续发展目标之间的冲突和协同作用，将作为进一步研究的基础。其次，应用于DTF的跨领域可持续性清单（SC）将允许每个研究人员分析每个可持续性要素（例如生物多样性，公众参与，空间利用，当地采购和回收）的决策时机和背景的影响。第三，工业生态学（IE）分析将遵循特定的资源（例如水，聚合体），从而突出它们的相互依赖性，而社会影响评估（SIA）方法将能够评估可持续性的社会文化方面（不包括在IE方法中）。这组工具支持工作包目标的交付。该分析将在历史案例的基础上进行，使用东区的开发场地，这些场地目前都是“活的”，每个场地代表着不同的可持续性概念。这提供了一个独特的机会来评估在规划和设计阶段对可持续性的早期思考的具体影响，以及这种时间和路径依赖对最终建筑形式的可持续性性能的影响。