A Randomized Controlled Study to Test the Effectiveness of Developmental Network Coaching in the Career Advancement of Diverse Early Stage Investigators

一项随机对照研究，测试发展网络辅导在不同早期研究人员职业发展中的有效性

• 批准号: 10655587
• 负责人: Elizabeth O. Ofili
• 金额: $ 68.43万
• 依托单位: MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2019-07-24 至 2024-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10655587
• 关键词: Address; Advisory Committees; Affect; Applications Grants; Award; Biomedical Research; Capital; Career Mobility; Categories; Characteristics; Classification; Clinical and Translational Science Awards; Collaborations; Collection; Community of Practice; Data; Development; Disease; Disparity; Education; Educational Curriculum; Ego; Funding; Future; Generations; Goals; Government; Grant; Group Structure; Individual; Industry; Institution; Intervention; Journals; Knowledge; Laboratories; Link; Measures; Mentors; Mentorship; Minority; Minority-Serving Institution; Modeling; Outcome; Peer Review; Phase; Positioning Attribute; Process; Productivity; Public Health; Publications; Recommendation; Research; Research Personnel; Resource Development; Resources; Role; Science; Scientist; Self Efficacy; Shapes; Social Sciences; Structure; Study Section; Technology; Testing; Theoretical model; Time; Training; Transcend; Underrepresented Populations; United States National Institutes of Health; Writing; biomedical scientist; career; collaboratory; compare effectiveness; contextual factors; effectiveness testing; empowerment; experience; health equity promotion; human capital; improved; peer; peer networks; primary outcome; psychosocial; public health research; randomized, controlled study; secondary outcome; skills; social capital; social cognitive theory; theories; virtual

PROJECT SUMMARY This proposal addresses three of the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director (ACD) recommendations on diversity in the biomedical research workforce: It 1) expands the concept of traditional dyadic mentoring, 2) focuses on sustaining a robust network of peers, content experts, and developers, and, 3) specifically targets career transition and progress toward research independence. We propose a randomized controlled study that aims (1) To compare the effectiveness of a developmental network (DN) informed intervention plus structured grant writing coaching compared with structured grant writing coaching alone, on the research productivity of early stage investigators (ESIs) including those from underrepresented groups. (2) To determine if institutional settings influence the developmental networks of diverse ESIs. We will engage diverse early stage investigators (ESIs) including scientists from NIH research networks such as Research Centers at Minority Institutions (RCMI), Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) and Institutional Development Awards (IDeA), as well as NIH disease focused Centers of Excellence. Scientists from these NIH funded networks have pledged support to be potential developers, sponsors and possible mentors for this experimental project These networks have research resources such as pilot funding and access to laboratories and mentors, to support project investigators. The intervention will be delivered in a technology enabled virtual collaboratory, which will support synchronous and asynchronous peer, coach and content expert interaction, with data generation and collection, allowing us to examine the effects of ESI characteristics, as well as the contextual factors, including institutional context and grant writing task requirements that shape the developmental network structure and content. The Primary Outcome is Research productivity, as measured by time to submission of a NIH grant application (K, R, U, and/or Minority Supplement mechanisms). Secondary outcomes include: i) Scored grants; ii) awarded grants iii) Publication in peer reviewed journals iv) ESI developer network measures including size, composition, and structure of each ego network; v) persistence and career progression in academic, industry, government or other non- academic research. Our study will lead to new knowledge about the role of developmental networks (social capital) in advancing the career of diverse early stage investigators, including those from underrepresented groups.

项目摘要 该提案针对NIH董事（ACD）的三个咨询委员会介绍 关于生物医学研究人员多样性的建议：1）扩大概念 传统的二元指导，2）专注于维持强大的同龄人网络 专家和开发人员，以及3）专门针对职业过渡和进步 研究独立性。我们提出了一项随机对照研究，旨在（1）比较 发展网络（DN）知情干预以及结构性赠款的有效性 写作教练与仅仅结构化的赠款写作教练相比 早期研究人员（ESI）的生产力，包括来自代表性不足的群体的生产率。 （2）确定机构环境是否影响各种ESI的发展网络。 我们将与包括NIH研究的科学家在内的各种早期研究人员（ESI）参与 少数民族机构（RCMI），临床和转化等网络等网络 科学奖（CTSA）和机构发展奖（思想）以及NIH病 集中的卓越中心。这些NIH资助的网络的科学家已承诺 支持该实验项目的潜在开发人员，赞助商和可能的导师 这些网络具有研究资源，例如试点资金和实验室的访问权限以及 导师，支持项目调查人员。干预将以技术进行 启用了虚拟协作，该协作将支持同步和异步的同行，教练 以及内容专家互动，以及数据生成和收集，使我们能够检查 ESI特征的影响以及上下文因素，包括机构环境 并授予写作任务要求，以塑造发展网络结构和 内容。主要结果是研究生产力，通过提交时间来衡量 NIH赠款申请（K，R，U和/或少数族裔补充机制）。次要 结果包括：i）得分； ii）授予赠款iii）在同行评审期刊上出版 iv）ESI开发人员网络措施，包括每个自我的大小，组成和结构 网络; v）学术，工业，政府或其他非 - 学术研究。我们的研究将导致有关发展作用的新知识 网络（社会资本）在推进各种早期调查员的职业方面，包括 来自代表性不足的群体的人。

项目成果

Cancer Prevention and Diagnosis Knowledge among Spanish-speaking Older Latino/as Residing in Tampa, Florida.

讲西班牙语的老年拉丁裔/居住在佛罗里达州坦帕的癌症预防和诊断知识。

• DOI: 10.18865/ed.32.3.185
• 发表时间: 2022
• 期刊: Ethnicity & disease
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Carrion,IraidaV;Neelamegam,Malinee;Estapé,Tania;Doering,Tracy;Snyder,Olivia;Tollinchi,Ebony;Estapé,Jorge
• 通讯作者: Estapé,Jorge