课题基金 / 基金详情

Comparative Effectiveness of Dementia Care Strategies in Underserved Communities

Comparative Effectiveness of Dementia Care Strategies in Underserved Communities
服务欠缺社区痴呆症护理策略的比较有效性
批准号:
8037877
负责人:
JOSHUA CHODOSH
金额:
$124.99万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2010
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2010-09-30 至 2013-09-30

项目摘要

项目成果

JOSHUA CHODOSH的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): While dementia carries profound implications for human suffering and economic burdens among more than 5 million people in the US and their caregivers, these implications are magnified in low-income communities. Dementia care management - in which social workers or nurses conduct structured assessments and work with patients and caregivers to identify problems and execute individually-tailored management protocols on an ongoing basis - has been proven to improve quality and outcomes of care when delivered in a clinic or as a combination of home visits and telephone. However, with growing cost-containment pressures, healthcare systems are increasingly pressured to deliver care management less expensively, i.e, exclusively by telephone. Yet, in Latino immigrant communities, cultural, language and educational barriers may mean that more intensive and in-person interactions at home and in community settings are needed to engage care recipients and caregivers in order to benefit from care management. In this randomized trial, two different strategies for delivery of dementia care management protocols will be compared. A community-centered care management strategy will partner a healthcare organization care manager with one from the Alzheimer's Association, who will collaborate in providing care management through home visits and in-person meetings at local facilities. In the comparison strategy, a single care manager at the healthcare organization will provide protocol-based telephone care management for the same number of participants. 250 patient/caregiver dyads from an economically-impoverished, predominantly Latino community in Los Angeles will be randomized and followed for 12 months. Aims are: (1) to test whether a community-centered dementia care management strategy compared to a telephone-only care management strategy yields lower caregiver burden and fewer challenging behaviors in care recipients. We hypothesize that the community-centered strategy will produce better outcomes due to greater cultural grounding from in-person delivery of care management in community settings or at home; (2) to test whether retention of participant dyads will be greater with a community- centered or a telephone-only care management strategy. We hypothesize that community-centered care management will be more successful in retention; and (3) to compare the costs and conduct a cost- effectiveness analysis of the two strategies. We hypothesize that the community-centered strategy will cost more but will produce greater reductions in caregiver burden and in problem behaviors in the care recipient. Findings will provide new knowledge on relative effectiveness of dementia care management strategies and their costs, in a predominantly Latino community in the public safety net system. It will measure caregiver burden and problem behaviors in care recipients, both of which are linked to costly institutionalization. With dementia's growing burden, these data will be critically important to administrators in public safety net settings, for decisions about the relative value of care delivery strategies in a highly-constrained fiscal climate. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Dementia is a condition that is growing in prevalence and which harms not only the afflicted individual but also adversely affects the health of their family and other informal caregivers. New methods for delivering comprehensive assistance to persons with dementia and their caregivers are known to be effective and can delay nursing home placement, but this study will discover (1) whether more face-to-face involvement rather than telephone delivery of this assistance will work better among poor patients in Los Angeles, and (2) if one method is better than the other, what are the differences in costs between them. These data will enable administrators in public health care settings around the US and non-profit foundations addressing dementia patient and caregiver need to decide what method provides the best value and the best outcome relative to its cost.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Administrative Core
Emergency Care Redesign (ECR)
Outreach, Recruitment and Engagement Core
Outreach, Recruitment and Engagement Core
海外基金